Constitutional and European legal rules for armaments’ quality and presentation of alternative procurement: Contribution to the possibilities of contractual optimisation in armament procurement (the contract as a force multiplier)

War is a legally relevant hazardous situation with potentially incalculable human casualties in terms of life and limb, especially of the soldiers in action. This dangerous situation is comparable to a nuclear power plant meltdown. Many European states have a constitutional obligation (not examined in detail). For example, the Federal Republic of Germany and Austria must qualitatively optimise armament for the purpose of protecting the fundamental rights of soldiers who may be fighting. This obligation exists throughout the EU based on the CFR and the jurisdiction of ECHR, in the rank of ordinary statutory law. Armament procurement is also a legal subject for multidimensional optimisation under numerous legal aspects, in particular the choice of contract type, price optimisation, and tax optimisation. Therefore, it should (finally) be considered multidimensionally for the benefit of the defence of freedom in EU-Europe and NATO as a whole. The procurement of defence equipment must contractually enable the core objectives of the state, namely secure availability, sustainable defence equipment, and cost-effective procurement. To this end, hundreds of individual contractual clauses and regulations must be used. Rental and leasing contract procurement is generally more cost-effective and otherwise offers no disadvantages compared to traditional purchase procurement. All conceivable disadvantages can be contractually prevented and avoided. Specific unavoidable disadvantages are practically not recognisable. It is a suitable “force multiplier and defence enabler.” Optimised contractual arrangements, particularly other contract types and VAT optimisation, can save at least tens of billions of euros per year in the whole EU-Europe. Due to the lower impact on the annual budget, more and/or better quality of armaments can be procured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Integration Studies
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46941/2024.2.2
Primary Topic
Military and Defense Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional and European legal rules for armaments’ quality and presentation of alternative procurement: Contribution to the possibilities of contractual optimisation in armament procurement (the contract as a force multiplier)

Karl-Heinz Gimmler
European Integration Studies
Military and Defense Studies
article

Constitutional and European legal rules for armaments’ quality and presentation of alternative procurement: Contribution to the possibilities of contractual optimisation in armament procurement (the contract as a force multiplier)

Karl-Heinz Gimmler
article en

Abstract

War is a legally relevant hazardous situation with potentially incalculable human casualties in terms of life and limb, especially of the soldiers in action. This dangerous situation is comparable to a nuclear power plant meltdown. Many European states have a constitutional obligation (not examined in detail). For example, the Federal Republic of Germany and Austria must qualitatively optimise armament for the purpose of protecting the fundamental rights of soldiers who may be fighting. This obligation exists throughout the EU based on the CFR and the jurisdiction of ECHR, in the rank of ordinary statutory law. Armament procurement is also a legal subject for multidimensional optimisation under numerous legal aspects, in particular the choice of contract type, price optimisation, and tax optimisation. Therefore, it should (finally) be considered multidimensionally for the benefit of the defence of freedom in EU-Europe and NATO as a whole. The procurement of defence equipment must contractually enable the core objectives of the state, namely secure availability, sustainable defence equipment, and cost-effective procurement. To this end, hundreds of individual contractual clauses and regulations must be used. Rental and leasing contract procurement is generally more cost-effective and otherwise offers no disadvantages compared to traditional purchase procurement. All conceivable disadvantages can be contractually prevented and avoided. Specific unavoidable disadvantages are practically not recognisable. It is a suitable “force multiplier and defence enabler.” Optimised contractual arrangements, particularly other contract types and VAT optimisation, can save at least tens of billions of euros per year in the whole EU-Europe. Due to the lower impact on the annual budget, more and/or better quality of armaments can be procured.

European Integration StudiesVol. 20(2)
Koblenz University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Military and Defense Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constitutional and European legal rules for armaments’ quality and presentation of alternative procurement: Contribution to the possibilities of contractual optimisation in armament procurement (the contract as a force multiplier) — Karl-Heinz Gimmler · European Integration Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS