Validating a Reading Comprehension Assessment for College Students: Preliminary Findings

The purpose of this study was to validate a novel reading comprehension assessment for college students named MOCCA-College. A random sample of college students (N = 63, average age of 22.5) were recruited from various education programs (e.g., first-year courses, TRIO, SONA) and completed MOCCA-College Online and were later recruited to complete face-to-face think-aloud and recall tasks, as well as standardized assessments such as the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT) and the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE-2). Based on the think-aloud findings, correct answers on MOCCA-College were associated with meaningful connections to background knowledge. Incorrect answers were associated with irrelevant connections to background knowledge that are not helpful for comprehension. Moreover, efficiency on MOCCA-College (seconds per correct answer) demonstrated criterion validity based on the NDRT and TOWRE-2. Future research and analyses may examine assessment development, particularly for identifying nuanced individual differences in college readers' comprehension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-025-10144-6
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating a Reading Comprehension Assessment for College Students: Preliminary Findings

Ben Seipel, Amanda Dahl, Virginia Clinton‐Lisell, Heather Ness-Maddox et al.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Validating a Reading Comprehension Assessment for College Students: Preliminary Findings

Ben Seipel, Amanda Dahl, Virginia Clinton‐Lisell, Heather Ness-Maddox, Sarah E. Carlson, Mark L. Davison, Terrill O. Taylor
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate a novel reading comprehension assessment for college students named MOCCA-College. A random sample of college students (N = 63, average age of 22.5) were recruited from various education programs (e.g., first-year courses, TRIO, SONA) and completed MOCCA-College Online and were later recruited to complete face-to-face think-aloud and recall tasks, as well as standardized assessments such as the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT) and the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE-2). Based on the think-aloud findings, correct answers on MOCCA-College were associated with meaningful connections to background knowledge. Incorrect answers were associated with irrelevant connections to background knowledge that are not helpful for comprehension. Moreover, efficiency on MOCCA-College (seconds per correct answer) demonstrated criterion validity based on the NDRT and TOWRE-2. Future research and analyses may examine assessment development, particularly for identifying nuanced individual differences in college readers' comprehension.

Journal of Psycholinguistic ResearchVol. 54(3)
University of Minnesota (US), Georgia State University (US), University of North Dakota (US), California State University, Chico (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Michigan State University (US), Middle Georgia State University (US)
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, California State University, Chico
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.