Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Diagrid Structural Buildings with Plan Irregularity

Earthquakes plays an important part in the analysis and designing of structure. It takes long time to analyse and design structure manually under different loading conditions but with the help of software the analysis and construction of any structure can be done easily so with the help of STAAD PRO software we Compare the performance of Diagrid Structural Building and conventional structural buildings with plan irregularities to analyze the stability of structure in seismic zone .Buildings with large height are more vulnerable to collapse due to high wind and earthquake load. The risk of failure in such a multistory building can be minimized by adopting lateral load resisting systems. In this study, modeling is done on irregular plan. For irregular plan, C-shape of plan and L-Shape of plan are considered. In this thesis, four models are analyzed, two diagrid frames, and two conventional frame models for C-Plan and L-Plan separately. The building consists twelve storey frame structure having total height 36m and storey height is kept 3 m for each floor. In this project the First Comparison done between diagrid structural system, and conventional frame structural system for C-Type and L-Plan separately and after that second overall comparison is between C-Plan and L- plan. Comparison has been done for different types of models for earthquake load case by considering various parameters like, displacement, base shear, bending moment. STADD PRO stands for structural analysis and design software.M40 grade of concrete and Fe-500 steel as per IS 800:2007 were used. Load combinations are taken as per IS 1893:2002 code and method of analysis used is Linear response method and live load are taken according to IS-875. Earthquake zone 4 has been adopted for analysis. When diagrid are connected to the floor the fluctuations of results occurred between the floor. The value of Base shear in diagrid structure is smaller than the bare frames. The result of work showed that diagrid system resist lateral load more efficiently than conventional frame as it yields the least value for displacement, bending moment and shear force

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59256/ijrtmr.20250502017
Primary Topic
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Diagrid Structural Buildings with Plan Irregularity

V. A. Kalmegh, Komal D. Burele
International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
article

Comparative Analysis of Conventional and Diagrid Structural Buildings with Plan Irregularity

V. A. Kalmegh, Komal D. Burele
article en

Abstract

Earthquakes plays an important part in the analysis and designing of structure. It takes long time to analyse and design structure manually under different loading conditions but with the help of software the analysis and construction of any structure can be done easily so with the help of STAAD PRO software we Compare the performance of Diagrid Structural Building and conventional structural buildings with plan irregularities to analyze the stability of structure in seismic zone .Buildings with large height are more vulnerable to collapse due to high wind and earthquake load. The risk of failure in such a multistory building can be minimized by adopting lateral load resisting systems. In this study, modeling is done on irregular plan. For irregular plan, C-shape of plan and L-Shape of plan are considered. In this thesis, four models are analyzed, two diagrid frames, and two conventional frame models for C-Plan and L-Plan separately. The building consists twelve storey frame structure having total height 36m and storey height is kept 3 m for each floor. In this project the First Comparison done between diagrid structural system, and conventional frame structural system for C-Type and L-Plan separately and after that second overall comparison is between C-Plan and L- plan. Comparison has been done for different types of models for earthquake load case by considering various parameters like, displacement, base shear, bending moment. STADD PRO stands for structural analysis and design software.M40 grade of concrete and Fe-500 steel as per IS 800:2007 were used. Load combinations are taken as per IS 1893:2002 code and method of analysis used is Linear response method and live load are taken according to IS-875. Earthquake zone 4 has been adopted for analysis. When diagrid are connected to the floor the fluctuations of results occurred between the floor. The value of Base shear in diagrid structure is smaller than the bare frames. The result of work showed that diagrid system resist lateral load more efficiently than conventional frame as it yields the least value for displacement, bending moment and shear force

International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.