EFFECTIVENESS OF SKIN TRACTION IN REDUCING PAIN IN ADULTS WITH HIP FRACTURE

Background: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and hospitalization among older adults. Effective pain management in the preoperative period is crucial to improve comfort, reduce complications and enhance outcomes. Skin traction, a non-invasive mechanical method has historically been used to align fractures and alleviate pain by reducing muscle spasms and joint movement. However, its actual efficacy in pain reduction remains a subject of debate in clinical practice. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of skin traction in reducing pain among adults with hip fractures during the preoperative period, compared to standard analgesic management alone. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 120 adult patients (aged ≥50 years) with radiologically confirmed hip fractures admitted to a Sughra Shafi Medical Complex. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n=60), which received standard analgesic therapy along with skin traction, and Group B (n=60), which received standard analgesic therapy alone. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Independent t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare pain scores between groups. Results: Both groups showed a significant reduction in VAS scores over the 24-hour period. At 6 hours, the mean VAS score in Group A was 6.2 ± 1.1, compared to 6.4 ± 1.2 in Group B (p=0.24). At 12 hours, Group A had a VAS score of 5.1 ± 1.0 versus 5.4 ± 1.1 in Group B (p=0.08). At 24 hours, Group A reported a VAS score of 4.3 ± 0.9, while Group B had 4.6 ± 1.0 (p=0.05). Although Group A demonstrated a slightly greater reduction in pain at each time point, the differences were not statistically significant. No major complications related to skin traction were observed. Conclusion: Skin traction, when used in conjunction with standard analgesics, provides a modest but clinically marginal benefit in reducing pain in adults with hip fractures. The lack of statistically significant difference suggests that while skin traction may be a safe adjunctive therapy, its routine use for pain management in hip fracture patients may not be justified.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/8w6va355
Primary Topic
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTIVENESS OF SKIN TRACTION IN REDUCING PAIN IN ADULTS WITH HIP FRACTURE

Muhammad Arshad Ghani, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Zeb Khan, Malik Muhammad Yassin Awan et al.
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
article

EFFECTIVENESS OF SKIN TRACTION IN REDUCING PAIN IN ADULTS WITH HIP FRACTURE

Muhammad Arshad Ghani, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Zeb Khan, Malik Muhammad Yassin Awan, Rana Mahmood Khurshid, Muhammad Mujtaba Afzal Khan
article en

Abstract

Background: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and hospitalization among older adults. Effective pain management in the preoperative period is crucial to improve comfort, reduce complications and enhance outcomes. Skin traction, a non-invasive mechanical method has historically been used to align fractures and alleviate pain by reducing muscle spasms and joint movement. However, its actual efficacy in pain reduction remains a subject of debate in clinical practice. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of skin traction in reducing pain among adults with hip fractures during the preoperative period, compared to standard analgesic management alone. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 120 adult patients (aged ≥50 years) with radiologically confirmed hip fractures admitted to a Sughra Shafi Medical Complex. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (n=60), which received standard analgesic therapy along with skin traction, and Group B (n=60), which received standard analgesic therapy alone. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Independent t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare pain scores between groups. Results: Both groups showed a significant reduction in VAS scores over the 24-hour period. At 6 hours, the mean VAS score in Group A was 6.2 ± 1.1, compared to 6.4 ± 1.2 in Group B (p=0.24). At 12 hours, Group A had a VAS score of 5.1 ± 1.0 versus 5.4 ± 1.1 in Group B (p=0.08). At 24 hours, Group A reported a VAS score of 4.3 ± 0.9, while Group B had 4.6 ± 1.0 (p=0.05). Although Group A demonstrated a slightly greater reduction in pain at each time point, the differences were not statistically significant. No major complications related to skin traction were observed. Conclusion: Skin traction, when used in conjunction with standard analgesics, provides a modest but clinically marginal benefit in reducing pain in adults with hip fractures. The lack of statistically significant difference suggests that while skin traction may be a safe adjunctive therapy, its routine use for pain management in hip fracture patients may not be justified.

Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.