Space and physical environment as a hidden curriculum: Comparing schools in Thailand

The study examines the physical environment of three different types of schools in Thailand: an inner-city school, a highly competitive school, and an alternative school. It investigates how these schools impart hidden curriculum to students and how this hidden curriculum perpetuates or challenges the prevailing ideology. Data was drawn from interviews with teachers, administrators, parents, and students, as well as observations of physical arrangements and school activities. The results demonstrate that the spatial configuration of the three schools, in conjunction with their pedagogical approaches and institutional cultures, had varying effects on students from different socioeconomic backgrounds and might have played a role in creating different and unequal future academic and career opportunities and pathways. However, the hidden curriculum of stringent regulation and hierarchical dominance has unintended consequences, resulting in transformations that question the inequitable power dynamics inside school.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Comparative and International Education
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999251334866
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Space and physical environment as a hidden curriculum: Comparing schools in Thailand

Thithimadee Arphattananon
1 citations
Research in Comparative and International Education
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
article

Space and physical environment as a hidden curriculum: Comparing schools in Thailand

Thithimadee Arphattananon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study examines the physical environment of three different types of schools in Thailand: an inner-city school, a highly competitive school, and an alternative school. It investigates how these schools impart hidden curriculum to students and how this hidden curriculum perpetuates or challenges the prevailing ideology. Data was drawn from interviews with teachers, administrators, parents, and students, as well as observations of physical arrangements and school activities. The results demonstrate that the spatial configuration of the three schools, in conjunction with their pedagogical approaches and institutional cultures, had varying effects on students from different socioeconomic backgrounds and might have played a role in creating different and unequal future academic and career opportunities and pathways. However, the hidden curriculum of stringent regulation and hierarchical dominance has unintended consequences, resulting in transformations that question the inequitable power dynamics inside school.

Research in Comparative and International EducationVol. 20(3)
Mahidol University (TH)
Mahidol University, National Research Council of Thailand
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Space and physical environment as a hidden curriculum: Comparing schools in Thailand — Thithimadee Arphattananon · Research in Comparative and International Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS