How Do People Think About the Relationship Between Science and Religion? A Cross-Cultural Psychometric Investigation

Few studies have systematically measured positions about the relationships between science and religion, and existing work has primarily focused on Christian samples from Western cultures. We collected data from individuals living in Australia, China, and the United States, encompassing both adults and undergraduates (total <i>N</i> = 985). We employed existing self-report instruments and novel items to measure positions about science and religion as well as individual attitudes toward science and religion (i.e., not in relation to one another). Exploratory factor and cluster analysis showed that, across samples, position dimensions included multiple facets of compatibility, both in general and specific terms, alongside a single conflict dimension. Correlations and moderated regressions showed that compatibility dimensions corresponded with depolarized attitudes toward science and religion, whereas the conflict dimension correlated with polarized attitudes. These results supported preregistered hypotheses. This study takes a step toward assessing positions more comprehensively, offering insights into their meanings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251335535
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do People Think About the Relationship Between Science and Religion? A Cross-Cultural Psychometric Investigation

Joshua A. Wilt, Gulnaz Anjum, Julie J. Exline
1 citations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
2.17
article

How Do People Think About the Relationship Between Science and Religion? A Cross-Cultural Psychometric Investigation

Joshua A. Wilt, Gulnaz Anjum, Julie J. Exline
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Few studies have systematically measured positions about the relationships between science and religion, and existing work has primarily focused on Christian samples from Western cultures. We collected data from individuals living in Australia, China, and the United States, encompassing both adults and undergraduates (total <i>N</i> = 985). We employed existing self-report instruments and novel items to measure positions about science and religion as well as individual attitudes toward science and religion (i.e., not in relation to one another). Exploratory factor and cluster analysis showed that, across samples, position dimensions included multiple facets of compatibility, both in general and specific terms, alongside a single conflict dimension. Correlations and moderated regressions showed that compatibility dimensions corresponded with depolarized attitudes toward science and religion, whereas the conflict dimension correlated with polarized attitudes. These results supported preregistered hypotheses. This study takes a step toward assessing positions more comprehensively, offering insights into their meanings.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
University of Limerick (IE), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Templeton Religion Trust
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.