College Students’ Perceptions and Willingness to Report Intimate Partner Violence

Past research suggests that college students perceive nonphysical (e.g., psychological) intimate partner violence (IPV) as less severe than physical IPV, but less is understood about how situational factors may impact perceptions of IPV. There is also less research on victim blaming across different types of IPV and IPV in non-heteronormative relationships. We used a mixed design with the type of IPV (control, emotional, intimidation, and physical) as a within-participants variable and alcohol presence and prior occurrences as between-subjects variables. Participants (<i>N</i> = 208) were college students at a regional Midwestern university. The participants were presented with vignettes depicting the different types of IPV and then asked a series of questions about perceived severity, the responsibility of the victim, and the responsibility to formally report. Gender-neutral names were used within the vignettes. The results show that participants found physical violence to be more severe than other types of violence; however, there was little to no effect of situational factors such as alcohol presence or prior incidents. The type of IPV had little to no effect on victim blaming. Participants were more likely to report physical IPV than psychological IPV. This research suggests that higher education institutions should invest in more education on nonphysical forms of IPV, which often leads to worse mental health outcomes despite student perceptions that nonphysical violence is less severe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251336336
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

College Students’ Perceptions and Willingness to Report Intimate Partner Violence

Kameko Halfmann, Lainee Mclennan, Magen Lyne
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

College Students’ Perceptions and Willingness to Report Intimate Partner Violence

Kameko Halfmann, Lainee Mclennan, Magen Lyne
article en

Abstract

Past research suggests that college students perceive nonphysical (e.g., psychological) intimate partner violence (IPV) as less severe than physical IPV, but less is understood about how situational factors may impact perceptions of IPV. There is also less research on victim blaming across different types of IPV and IPV in non-heteronormative relationships. We used a mixed design with the type of IPV (control, emotional, intimidation, and physical) as a within-participants variable and alcohol presence and prior occurrences as between-subjects variables. Participants (<i>N</i> = 208) were college students at a regional Midwestern university. The participants were presented with vignettes depicting the different types of IPV and then asked a series of questions about perceived severity, the responsibility of the victim, and the responsibility to formally report. Gender-neutral names were used within the vignettes. The results show that participants found physical violence to be more severe than other types of violence; however, there was little to no effect of situational factors such as alcohol presence or prior incidents. The type of IPV had little to no effect on victim blaming. Participants were more likely to report physical IPV than psychological IPV. This research suggests that higher education institutions should invest in more education on nonphysical forms of IPV, which often leads to worse mental health outcomes despite student perceptions that nonphysical violence is less severe.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of Wisconsin–Platteville (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.