Offset Between Profiling Float and Shipboard Oxygen Observations at Depth Imparts Bias on Float pH and Derived <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub>

Abstract Profiles of oxygen measurements from Argo profiling floats now vastly outnumber shipboard profiles. To correct for drift, float oxygen data are often initially adjusted to deployment casts, ship‐based climatologies, or, recently, measurements of atmospheric oxygen for in situ calibration. Air calibration enables accurate measurements in the upper ocean but may not provide similar accuracy at depth. Using a quality controlled shipboard data set, we find that the entire Argo oxygen data set is offset relative to shipboard measurements (float minus ship) at pressures of 1,450–2,000 db by a median of −1.9 μmol kg −1 (mean ± SD of −1.9 ± 3.9, 95% confidence interval around the mean of {−2.2, −1.6}) and air‐calibrated floats are offset by −2.7 μmol kg −1 (−3.0 ± 3.4 (CI 95% {−3.7, −2.4}). The difference between float and shipboard oxygen is likely due to offsets in the float oxygen data and not oxygen changes at depth or biases in the shipboard data set. In addition to complicating the calculation of long‐term ocean oxygen changes, these float oxygen offsets impact the adjustment of float nitrate and pH measurements, therefore biasing important derived quantities such as the partial pressure of CO 2 ( p CO 2 ) and dissolved inorganic carbon. Correcting floats with air‐calibrated oxygen sensors for the float‐ship oxygen offsets alters float pH by a median of 3.0 mpH (3.1 ± 3.7) and float‐derived surface p CO 2 by −3.2 μatm (−3.2 ± 3.9). This adjustment to float p CO 2 represents half, or more, of the bias in float‐derived p CO 2 reported in studies comparing float p CO 2 to shipboard p CO 2 measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gb008185
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Offset Between Profiling Float and Shipboard Oxygen Observations at Depth Imparts Bias on Float pH and Derived pCO2

Veronica Tamsitt, Seth M. Bushinsky, Yuichiro Takeshita, Andrea J. Fassbender et al.
6 citations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
4.42
article

Offset Between Profiling Float and Shipboard Oxygen Observations at Depth Imparts Bias on Float pH and Derived pCO2

Veronica Tamsitt, Seth M. Bushinsky, Yuichiro Takeshita, Andrea J. Fassbender, Nancy L. Williams, Zachary Nachod
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Profiles of oxygen measurements from Argo profiling floats now vastly outnumber shipboard profiles. To correct for drift, float oxygen data are often initially adjusted to deployment casts, ship‐based climatologies, or, recently, measurements of atmospheric oxygen for in situ calibration. Air calibration enables accurate measurements in the upper ocean but may not provide similar accuracy at depth. Using a quality controlled shipboard data set, we find that the entire Argo oxygen data set is offset relative to shipboard measurements (float minus ship) at pressures of 1,450–2,000 db by a median of −1.9 μmol kg −1 (mean ± SD of −1.9 ± 3.9, 95% confidence interval around the mean of {−2.2, −1.6}) and air‐calibrated floats are offset by −2.7 μmol kg −1 (−3.0 ± 3.4 (CI 95% {−3.7, −2.4}). The difference between float and shipboard oxygen is likely due to offsets in the float oxygen data and not oxygen changes at depth or biases in the shipboard data set. In addition to complicating the calculation of long‐term ocean oxygen changes, these float oxygen offsets impact the adjustment of float nitrate and pH measurements, therefore biasing important derived quantities such as the partial pressure of CO 2 ( p CO 2 ) and dissolved inorganic carbon. Correcting floats with air‐calibrated oxygen sensors for the float‐ship oxygen offsets alters float pH by a median of 3.0 mpH (3.1 ± 3.7) and float‐derived surface p CO 2 by −3.2 μatm (−3.2 ± 3.9). This adjustment to float p CO 2 represents half, or more, of the bias in float‐derived p CO 2 reported in studies comparing float p CO 2 to shipboard p CO 2 measurements.

Global Biogeochemical CyclesVol. 39(5)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (US), NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (US), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL), University of South Florida St. Petersburg (US)
Division of Ocean Sciences, Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing Program, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.