Montage and Narrative Mode in Spanish Women’s Life Writing

In recent autobiographical experiments by Spanish women authors, montage cuts through façades of cohesion that obscure the power dynamics behind writing lives. Rosa Montero’s La ridícula idea de no volver a verte (2013) and Cristina Fallarás’s Honrarás a tu padre y a tu madre (2018) shatter singular modes of storytelling as they entwine disparate histories in the same textual space. Montero’s auto/biographical account relates the life of Marie Curie to her own life and loss and to the wider effacement of women in socio-historical narratives, while Fallarás’s faction draws into dialogue the incompatible halves of her family history, victors and vanquished of the Civil War. Ostensibly very different, the texts enmesh narrative modes, styles and a hotchpotch of sources – written and visual – to similarly disconcerting effect. Through the gaps between their mismatched pieces, these montages expose the ever-partial composition of the collective histories that Montero and Fallarás seek to unpick.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Contemporary Hispanic Studies
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/bchs.2025.5
Primary Topic
Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Montage and Narrative Mode in Spanish Women’s Life Writing

Hannie Lawlor
Bulletin of Contemporary Hispanic Studies
Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
article

Montage and Narrative Mode in Spanish Women’s Life Writing

Hannie Lawlor
article en

Abstract

In recent autobiographical experiments by Spanish women authors, montage cuts through façades of cohesion that obscure the power dynamics behind writing lives. Rosa Montero’s La ridícula idea de no volver a verte (2013) and Cristina Fallarás’s Honrarás a tu padre y a tu madre (2018) shatter singular modes of storytelling as they entwine disparate histories in the same textual space. Montero’s auto/biographical account relates the life of Marie Curie to her own life and loss and to the wider effacement of women in socio-historical narratives, while Fallarás’s faction draws into dialogue the incompatible halves of her family history, victors and vanquished of the Civil War. Ostensibly very different, the texts enmesh narrative modes, styles and a hotchpotch of sources – written and visual – to similarly disconcerting effect. Through the gaps between their mismatched pieces, these montages expose the ever-partial composition of the collective histories that Montero and Fallarás seek to unpick.

Bulletin of Contemporary Hispanic StudiesVol. 7(1)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Spanish Literature and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.