Price formation without fuel costs: The interaction of demand elasticity with storage bidding

Studies looking at electricity market designs for very high shares of wind and solar often conclude that the energy-only market will break down. Without fuel costs, it is said that there is nothing to set prices. Symptoms of breakdown include long phases of zero prices, scarcity prices too high to be politically acceptable, prices that collapse under small perturbations of capacities from the long-term equilibrium, cost recovery that is impossible due to low market values, high variability of revenue between different weather years, and difficulty operating long-term storage with limited foresight. We argue that all these problems are an artefact of modelling with perfectly inelastic demand. If short-term elasticity to reflect today’s flexible demand (-5%) is implemented in the model, these problems are significantly reduced. The combined interaction of demand willingness to pay and storage opportunity costs is enough to produce stable pricing. This behavior is illustrated by a model with wind, solar, batteries, and hydrogen-based storage, where the price duration curve is significantly smoothed with a piecewise linear demand curve. This removes high price peaks, reduces the fraction of zero-price hours from 90% to around 30%, and guarantees more price stability for perturbations of capacity and different weather years. Fuels derived from green hydrogen take over the role of fossil fuels as the backup of final resort. Furthermore, we show that with demand elasticity, the long-term optimisation model exactly reproduces the prices of the short-term model with the same capacities. We then use insights from the long-term model to derive simple bidding strategies for storage so that we can also run the short-term model with limited operational foresight. We demonstrate this short-term operation in a model optimised using 35 years of weather data and then tested on another 35 years of unseen data. We conclude that the energy-only market can still play a key role in coordinating dispatch and investment in the future. • Energy-only markets can remain functional with 100% zero-marginal-cost wind and solar. • Price bifurcation to zero and high levels is an artefact of modelling perfectly inelastic demand. • With demand elasticity, zero-price hours reduce from 90% to 30% of the time. • Demand elasticity stabilises prices for many years and capacity perturbations, and allows myopic operational foresight using stable marginal storage values. • Demand elasticity allows identical price formation in capacity expansion and operational models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108483
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Price formation without fuel costs: The interaction of demand elasticity with storage bidding

Iegor Riepin, Tom Brown, Fabian Neumann
10 citations
Energy Economics
Smart Grid Energy Management
7.30
article

Price formation without fuel costs: The interaction of demand elasticity with storage bidding

Iegor Riepin, Tom Brown, Fabian Neumann
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Studies looking at electricity market designs for very high shares of wind and solar often conclude that the energy-only market will break down. Without fuel costs, it is said that there is nothing to set prices. Symptoms of breakdown include long phases of zero prices, scarcity prices too high to be politically acceptable, prices that collapse under small perturbations of capacities from the long-term equilibrium, cost recovery that is impossible due to low market values, high variability of revenue between different weather years, and difficulty operating long-term storage with limited foresight. We argue that all these problems are an artefact of modelling with perfectly inelastic demand. If short-term elasticity to reflect today’s flexible demand (-5%) is implemented in the model, these problems are significantly reduced. The combined interaction of demand willingness to pay and storage opportunity costs is enough to produce stable pricing. This behavior is illustrated by a model with wind, solar, batteries, and hydrogen-based storage, where the price duration curve is significantly smoothed with a piecewise linear demand curve. This removes high price peaks, reduces the fraction of zero-price hours from 90% to around 30%, and guarantees more price stability for perturbations of capacity and different weather years. Fuels derived from green hydrogen take over the role of fossil fuels as the backup of final resort. Furthermore, we show that with demand elasticity, the long-term optimisation model exactly reproduces the prices of the short-term model with the same capacities. We then use insights from the long-term model to derive simple bidding strategies for storage so that we can also run the short-term model with limited operational foresight. We demonstrate this short-term operation in a model optimised using 35 years of weather data and then tested on another 35 years of unseen data. We conclude that the energy-only market can still play a key role in coordinating dispatch and investment in the future. • Energy-only markets can remain functional with 100% zero-marginal-cost wind and solar. • Price bifurcation to zero and high levels is an artefact of modelling perfectly inelastic demand. • With demand elasticity, zero-price hours reduce from 90% to 30% of the time. • Demand elasticity stabilises prices for many years and capacity perturbations, and allows myopic operational foresight using stable marginal storage values. • Demand elasticity allows identical price formation in capacity expansion and operational models.

Energy EconomicsVol. 147
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Smart Grid Energy Management
7.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.