Comparative prognostic value of ultrasound and CT scan in postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer

This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate and compare the prognostic assessment value of ultrasound and CT scans in post-operative follow-up of colorectal cancer patients. A retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. The ultrasound follow-up group included 103 patients, while the CT scan follow-up group comprised 95 patients. Imaging follow-up was performed at 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. Primary outcomes included local recurrence rates, distant metastasis detection rates, prognostic prediction accuracy, and the sensitivity and specificity of both imaging methods. Among 198 patients, local recurrence rates were 14.6% (29/198) in the ultrasound group and 16.2% (32/198) in the CT scan group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.62). Distant metastasis detection rates were 10.1% (20/198) for ultrasound and 13.1% (26/198) for CT scans, also showing no significant statistical difference (P=0.34). The positive predictive value for prognosis was 78.3% for ultrasound and 82.5% for CT scans. Ultrasound showed lower sensitivity (65.4%) for lesions smaller than 2cm, while CT scans demonstrated significantly higher detection rates for small lesions (82.7%, P<0.01). CT scans showed slightly superior performance in post-operative prognostic assessment of colorectal cancer, particularly in detecting small lesions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Problems in Surgery
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2025.101786
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative prognostic value of ultrasound and CT scan in postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer

Chao Shen, Lin Chen, Wei Li, Yichao Yan et al.
2 citations
Current Problems in Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
2.09
article

Comparative prognostic value of ultrasound and CT scan in postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer

Chao Shen, Lin Chen, Wei Li, Yichao Yan, Ning Ning, Ji Shi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This retrospective comparative study aimed to evaluate and compare the prognostic assessment value of ultrasound and CT scans in post-operative follow-up of colorectal cancer patients. A retrospective analysis of colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. The ultrasound follow-up group included 103 patients, while the CT scan follow-up group comprised 95 patients. Imaging follow-up was performed at 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. Primary outcomes included local recurrence rates, distant metastasis detection rates, prognostic prediction accuracy, and the sensitivity and specificity of both imaging methods. Among 198 patients, local recurrence rates were 14.6% (29/198) in the ultrasound group and 16.2% (32/198) in the CT scan group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.62). Distant metastasis detection rates were 10.1% (20/198) for ultrasound and 13.1% (26/198) for CT scans, also showing no significant statistical difference (P=0.34). The positive predictive value for prognosis was 78.3% for ultrasound and 82.5% for CT scans. Ultrasound showed lower sensitivity (65.4%) for lesions smaller than 2cm, while CT scans demonstrated significantly higher detection rates for small lesions (82.7%, P<0.01). CT scans showed slightly superior performance in post-operative prognostic assessment of colorectal cancer, particularly in detecting small lesions.

Current Problems in SurgeryVol. 69
Peking University (CN), Peking University International Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.