Integrated direct air CO2 capture and solid oxide electrolyzer for sustainable chemical production: Case studies of methanol and synthesis fuel

This paper presents a comprehensive study of a novel system aimed at producing chemicals from CO 2 captured from the atmosphere by integrating direct air capture (DAC) and solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC). Two case studies for the chemical produced were considered: CO 2 to methanol and CO 2 to synthetic fuel (synfuel). All scenarios were based on a DAC system capturing 250,000 tonnes per year of CO 2 from the atmosphere. Using Aspen Plus, the results revealed insights into energy consumption, resource utilization, and economic viability. The system produced 36.4 tonne/hr of methanol and 15.1 tonne/hr of synfuel. Methanol production requires 403 MW of electricity and 10.9 tonne/hr of natural gas, with a specific energy consumption of 26.0 kWh/kg-MeOH. Synfuel production demands higher utility usage of 53.9 kWh/kg-synfuel (360 MW electricity, and 7.09 tonne/hr of natural gas). Economic analysis shows a total annual cost and levelized production cost for methanol of $346 M/year and 1.32 $/kg, respectively; for synfuels, the values are $301 M/year and 2.78 $/kg, respectively. Environmental analysis indicates that the amount of CO 2 captured per product unit is for synfuel 1.88 kg-CO 2 captured/kg-synfuel, and for methanol 0.58 kg-CO 2 captured/kg-MeOH. Using Ontario's grid and natural gas emission factor, emission for methanol production amounts to 31.1 g-CO 2 -eq/MJ-MeOH, while for synfuel, it stands at 5.2 g-CO 2 -eq/MJ-synfuel. However, these emissions can be notably reduced by transitioning to renewable sources of electricity and can even become negative in the case of synfuel when hydropower and wind are used as electricity sources. • A CO 2 direct air capture/SOEC to methanol or synfuel system is proposed. • The system is based on a 250,000 tonne/year of CO 2 captured by DAC. • The system produces 36.4 tonne/hr of methanol and 15.1 tonne/hr of synfuel. • Levelized production costs are 1.32 $/kg MeOH and 2.78 $/kg Synfuel . • Equivalent GHG emissions are 31.1 g CO 2 -eq/MJ-MeOH and 5.2 g CO 2 -eq/MJ-synfuel

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103096
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated direct air CO2 capture and solid oxide electrolyzer for sustainable chemical production: Case studies of methanol and synthesis fuel

Eric Croiset, Vahid Barahimi, Mohammad Ali Emadi
4 citations
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
1.56
article

Integrated direct air CO2 capture and solid oxide electrolyzer for sustainable chemical production: Case studies of methanol and synthesis fuel

Eric Croiset, Vahid Barahimi, Mohammad Ali Emadi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of a novel system aimed at producing chemicals from CO 2 captured from the atmosphere by integrating direct air capture (DAC) and solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC). Two case studies for the chemical produced were considered: CO 2 to methanol and CO 2 to synthetic fuel (synfuel). All scenarios were based on a DAC system capturing 250,000 tonnes per year of CO 2 from the atmosphere. Using Aspen Plus, the results revealed insights into energy consumption, resource utilization, and economic viability. The system produced 36.4 tonne/hr of methanol and 15.1 tonne/hr of synfuel. Methanol production requires 403 MW of electricity and 10.9 tonne/hr of natural gas, with a specific energy consumption of 26.0 kWh/kg-MeOH. Synfuel production demands higher utility usage of 53.9 kWh/kg-synfuel (360 MW electricity, and 7.09 tonne/hr of natural gas). Economic analysis shows a total annual cost and levelized production cost for methanol of $346 M/year and 1.32 $/kg, respectively; for synfuels, the values are $301 M/year and 2.78 $/kg, respectively. Environmental analysis indicates that the amount of CO 2 captured per product unit is for synfuel 1.88 kg-CO 2 captured/kg-synfuel, and for methanol 0.58 kg-CO 2 captured/kg-MeOH. Using Ontario's grid and natural gas emission factor, emission for methanol production amounts to 31.1 g-CO 2 -eq/MJ-MeOH, while for synfuel, it stands at 5.2 g-CO 2 -eq/MJ-synfuel. However, these emissions can be notably reduced by transitioning to renewable sources of electricity and can even become negative in the case of synfuel when hydropower and wind are used as electricity sources. • A CO 2 direct air capture/SOEC to methanol or synfuel system is proposed. • The system is based on a 250,000 tonne/year of CO 2 captured by DAC. • The system produces 36.4 tonne/hr of methanol and 15.1 tonne/hr of synfuel. • Levelized production costs are 1.32 $/kg MeOH and 2.78 $/kg Synfuel . • Equivalent GHG emissions are 31.1 g CO 2 -eq/MJ-MeOH and 5.2 g CO 2 -eq/MJ-synfuel

Journal of CO2 UtilizationVol. 96
University of Waterloo (CA)
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.