Virus detection in influent, activated sludge, and effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants using composite and grab samples in Finland

Wastewater-based surveillance has been commonly used as a monitoring tool for public health. Also, viruses present in wastewater can pose a health risk. In this study, we screened enterovirus, rhinovirus, norovirus GI and GII, pan-adenovirus, and gastroenteritis-causing adenovirus F40/41 in different wastewater sample types using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. We analyzed composite influent samples (N = 22), grab influent samples (N = 20), composite effluent samples (N = 78), grab effluent samples (N = 21), and activated sludge samples (N = 34) collected from six municipal wastewater treatment plants in the Pirkanmaa region of Finland. We detected the viruses in the influent to discover if they had the potential to be monitored using wastewater-based surveillance. In addition, we studied viruses in effluent and activated sludge to detect viruses that persisted in treatment processes. Furthermore, all sample types were compared to discover differences in the viral contents of different wastewater sample types. We detected all the studied viruses in influent, while in activated sludge, we detected enterovirus, pan-adenovirus, and adenovirus F40/41, and in effluent enterovirus, norovirus GI and GII, pan-adenovirus, and adenovirus F40/41 were identified. In addition, the relative amount of all the viruses was the highest in the influent. Our study also showed that composite sampling was a more representative and sensitive method for virus monitoring in wastewater than grab sampling, as the relative amount of the viruses present in composite samples was higher than in grab samples. Since we found abundant viruses in effluent, further studies are required to assess their infectivity and potential health risks as environmental pollutants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121776
Citations
2
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virus detection in influent, activated sludge, and effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants using composite and grab samples in Finland

Heikki Hyöty, Outi Kaarela, Sami Oikarinen, Marja R.T. Palmroth et al.
2 citations
Environmental Research
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
2.79
article

Virus detection in influent, activated sludge, and effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants using composite and grab samples in Finland

Heikki Hyöty, Outi Kaarela, Sami Oikarinen, Marja R.T. Palmroth, K. Lehto, Annika Länsivaara
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wastewater-based surveillance has been commonly used as a monitoring tool for public health. Also, viruses present in wastewater can pose a health risk. In this study, we screened enterovirus, rhinovirus, norovirus GI and GII, pan-adenovirus, and gastroenteritis-causing adenovirus F40/41 in different wastewater sample types using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. We analyzed composite influent samples (N = 22), grab influent samples (N = 20), composite effluent samples (N = 78), grab effluent samples (N = 21), and activated sludge samples (N = 34) collected from six municipal wastewater treatment plants in the Pirkanmaa region of Finland. We detected the viruses in the influent to discover if they had the potential to be monitored using wastewater-based surveillance. In addition, we studied viruses in effluent and activated sludge to detect viruses that persisted in treatment processes. Furthermore, all sample types were compared to discover differences in the viral contents of different wastewater sample types. We detected all the studied viruses in influent, while in activated sludge, we detected enterovirus, pan-adenovirus, and adenovirus F40/41, and in effluent enterovirus, norovirus GI and GII, pan-adenovirus, and adenovirus F40/41 were identified. In addition, the relative amount of all the viruses was the highest in the influent. Our study also showed that composite sampling was a more representative and sensitive method for virus monitoring in wastewater than grab sampling, as the relative amount of the viruses present in composite samples was higher than in grab samples. Since we found abundant viruses in effluent, further studies are required to assess their infectivity and potential health risks as environmental pollutants.

Environmental ResearchVol. 279(Pt 2)
University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.