What factors predict user acceptance of ChatGPT for mental and physical healthcare: an extended technology acceptance model framework

Abstract The rise of ChatGPT has emphasized the need for an improved conceptual understanding of users’ agency when interacting with artificial intelligence (AI) systems for healthcare. Australian ChatGPT users ( N = 216) completed a repeated measures online survey. Hierarchical regression analyses assessed the influence of demographic factors (age and gender), Technology Acceptance Model constructs (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use), and extended variables (trust, privacy concerns) on users' behavioral intentions to use ChatGPT for physical and mental healthcare. The proposed model was partially supported: the findings emphasized the need to establish user trust in ChatGPT and its perceived usefulness in both areas of healthcare. Privacy concerns were a significant predictor of intentions to use ChatGPT for mental healthcare with perceived ease of use predicting intentions to use ChatGPT for physical healthcare. The findings indicate predictors of uses of AI cannot be generalized across healthcare types and unique drivers should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02334-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What factors predict user acceptance of ChatGPT for mental and physical healthcare: an extended technology acceptance model framework

Óscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Sherrie-Anne Kaye, Sage Kelly, Katherine Marie White
3 citations
AI & Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

What factors predict user acceptance of ChatGPT for mental and physical healthcare: an extended technology acceptance model framework

Óscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Sherrie-Anne Kaye, Sage Kelly, Katherine Marie White
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rise of ChatGPT has emphasized the need for an improved conceptual understanding of users’ agency when interacting with artificial intelligence (AI) systems for healthcare. Australian ChatGPT users ( N = 216) completed a repeated measures online survey. Hierarchical regression analyses assessed the influence of demographic factors (age and gender), Technology Acceptance Model constructs (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use), and extended variables (trust, privacy concerns) on users' behavioral intentions to use ChatGPT for physical and mental healthcare. The proposed model was partially supported: the findings emphasized the need to establish user trust in ChatGPT and its perceived usefulness in both areas of healthcare. Privacy concerns were a significant predictor of intentions to use ChatGPT for mental healthcare with perceived ease of use predicting intentions to use ChatGPT for physical healthcare. The findings indicate predictors of uses of AI cannot be generalized across healthcare types and unique drivers should be considered.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(8)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Queensland University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What factors predict user acceptance of ChatGPT for mental and physical healthcare: an extended technology acceptance model framework — Óscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Sherrie-Anne Kaye, et al. · AI & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS