Public Order and the Foundations of Legal Order in International Private Law — Synonyms or Intersecting Concepts?

It is established that the relationship between legal institutions, “public order” and “fundamentals of legal order”, is determined by F. K. Savigny through the concepts and features of imperative social norms that exclude the effect of foreign law. The formation and consolidation of these legal institutions in doctrine and legislation is studied. The imperative reasons for the coincidence of the concepts of “fundamentals of the Soviet legal order (public order)” in the Soviet period are indicated. It is noted that the foundations of legal order and public order in international private law are intersecting concepts, where the former is part of the latter. It is established that the legal template in effect in Soviet times, according to which “fundamentals of legal order” and “public order” were synonyms, is an anachronism and is not suitable for characterizing the rules enshrined in Articles 1992 and 1193 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Article 167 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2025.127.3.143-151
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Order and the Foundations of Legal Order in International Private Law — Synonyms or Intersecting Concepts?

А. А. Шулаков
Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

Public Order and the Foundations of Legal Order in International Private Law — Synonyms or Intersecting Concepts?

А. А. Шулаков
article en

Abstract

It is established that the relationship between legal institutions, “public order” and “fundamentals of legal order”, is determined by F. K. Savigny through the concepts and features of imperative social norms that exclude the effect of foreign law. The formation and consolidation of these legal institutions in doctrine and legislation is studied. The imperative reasons for the coincidence of the concepts of “fundamentals of the Soviet legal order (public order)” in the Soviet period are indicated. It is noted that the foundations of legal order and public order in international private law are intersecting concepts, where the former is part of the latter. It is established that the legal template in effect in Soviet times, according to which “fundamentals of legal order” and “public order” were synonyms, is an anachronism and is not suitable for characterizing the rules enshrined in Articles 1992 and 1193 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Article 167 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation.

Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)Vol. 1(3)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.