Quality of data from cancer registries in Italy: An appraisal

We report the results of the quality assessment on data collected by cancer registries belonging to the Italian network of Cancer Registries (AIRTUM). For all malignant cancers diagnosed in 2013-2017, overall percentages of cases known from the death certificate only (DCO), and those of cases with cyto-histological confirmation (MV), were provided. The overall percentage of DCOs was small (1.2 %). The percentage of microscopic verification was overall high (87.6 %), with some variations among registries. DCO proportion varied from 0.1 % for cutaneous melanoma to 3.8 % for liver and pancreatic tumours. Differences across sites in MV proportion were linked to the different diagnostics. The rate of cases lost to follow-up was on average very low (0.7 %). This quality evaluation confirmed that data provided by the Italian cancer registries were affordable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2025.102829
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of data from cancer registries in Italy: An appraisal

Emanuele Crocetti, Francesco Di Mario, Martin A. Walter, Viviana Perotti et al.
2 citations
Cancer Epidemiology
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
2.71
article

Quality of data from cancer registries in Italy: An appraisal

Emanuele Crocetti, Francesco Di Mario, Martin A. Walter, Viviana Perotti, Fabiano Sabrina, Carlo Di Paolo, Fabrizio Stracci, Tagliabue Giovanna, Buzzoni Carlotta, Russo Antonio Giampiero, Zarcone Maurizio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We report the results of the quality assessment on data collected by cancer registries belonging to the Italian network of Cancer Registries (AIRTUM). For all malignant cancers diagnosed in 2013-2017, overall percentages of cases known from the death certificate only (DCO), and those of cases with cyto-histological confirmation (MV), were provided. The overall percentage of DCOs was small (1.2 %). The percentage of microscopic verification was overall high (87.6 %), with some variations among registries. DCO proportion varied from 0.1 % for cutaneous melanoma to 3.8 % for liver and pancreatic tumours. Differences across sites in MV proportion were linked to the different diagnostics. The rate of cases lost to follow-up was on average very low (0.7 %). This quality evaluation confirmed that data provided by the Italian cancer registries were affordable.

Cancer EpidemiologyVol. 97
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Regione Campania (IT), Health Protection Agency (MV), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quality of data from cancer registries in Italy: An appraisal — Emanuele Crocetti, Francesco Di Mario, et al. · Cancer Epidemiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS