A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals

The rapid proliferation of healthcare service applications (apps) makes it challenging for consumers to determine the best one for their needs, prompting the Korean government to introduce an accreditation program to verify app safety. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the choice of healthcare service apps among physicians, patients with chronic diseases, and healthy individuals. We conducted a choice-based conjoint analysis with six factors (number of studies on effectiveness, frequency of information delivery, cybersecurity and data safety, user satisfaction, accreditation, and costs). 1,093 participants (407 healthy individuals, 589 patients, and 97 physicians) participated in the online survey. Across all groups, cybersecurity and data safety were the most important preference factors (healthy individuals: β = 2.127, 95% CI 2.096-2.338, patients: β = 1.569, 95% CI 1.481-1.658, physicians: β = 1.111, 95% CI 0.908-1.314). All groups were willing to pay more approximately $12 for high cybersecurity and data safety compared to low.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01610-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals

Jaeyong Shin, Mingee Choi, Junbok Lee, Jung Hyun Kim
1 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
2.82
article

A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals

Jaeyong Shin, Mingee Choi, Junbok Lee, Jung Hyun Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of healthcare service applications (apps) makes it challenging for consumers to determine the best one for their needs, prompting the Korean government to introduce an accreditation program to verify app safety. This study aims to identify the factors influencing the choice of healthcare service apps among physicians, patients with chronic diseases, and healthy individuals. We conducted a choice-based conjoint analysis with six factors (number of studies on effectiveness, frequency of information delivery, cybersecurity and data safety, user satisfaction, accreditation, and costs). 1,093 participants (407 healthy individuals, 589 patients, and 97 physicians) participated in the online survey. Across all groups, cybersecurity and data safety were the most important preference factors (healthy individuals: β = 2.127, 95% CI 2.096-2.338, patients: β = 1.569, 95% CI 1.481-1.658, physicians: β = 1.111, 95% CI 0.908-1.314). All groups were willing to pay more approximately $12 for high cybersecurity and data safety compared to low.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Yonsei University (KR), Yonsei University Health System (KR), Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals — Jaeyong Shin, Mingee Choi, et al. · npj Digital Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS