Commodification and co-benefits: Neoliberalism and the growth of regenerative agriculture in Australia

‘Regenerative agriculture’ is attracting increasing attention as a farming approach which could rejuvenate agricultural landscapes and support farmer wellbeing. However, regenerative agriculture's popularity in neoliberal economies such as Australia remains under-interrogated in terms of how this political-economic context might influence the adoption of regenerative practices. Furthermore, research on regenerative agriculture has largely focussed on individual farmer motivations for adopting regenerative agriculture and has failed to capture policymaker perspectives on the movement. Our research addresses these gaps by exploring the drivers of regenerative agriculture's growth in Australia based on 38 semi-structured interviews with policymakers and farmers. We then consider how policy settings have influenced these drivers through a content analysis of 244 documents related to regenerative agriculture from Australian governments. Our results highlight that while there is minimal explicit support among policymakers and institutions for regenerative agriculture, they remain enthusiastic about the economic and environmental co-benefits regenerative agriculture practices could provide, and capitalising upon them through nature markets. Our findings also demonstrate that economic factors are the primary driver of the growth of regenerative agriculture in Australia. In contrast with studies that emphasise eco-centric motivations for regenerative agriculture, our findings highlight how Australia's neoliberal policy setting is extending the commodification of nature and embedding extractivist, as opposed to reciprocal, human-nature value relations in the movement. We conclude with a discussion on how policy support based on principles of environmental stewardship and reciprocal relationality could instead sustain regenerative agriculture's growth without a reliance on economic incentives as a driver of change. • We interviewed policymakers and farmers on the drivers of regenerative agriculture's growth. • There is a lack of specific policy support for regenerative agriculture beyond nature markets. • Economic motivations were found to be a central driver for the uptake of regenerative agriculture. • Australia's neoliberal policy setting is influencing these outcomes. • Our findings challenge assumptions that regenerative farming is motivated by ecocentric values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103692
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commodification and co-benefits: Neoliberalism and the growth of regenerative agriculture in Australia

Federico Davila, R. Plant, Anja Bless
5 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
24.16
article

Commodification and co-benefits: Neoliberalism and the growth of regenerative agriculture in Australia

Federico Davila, R. Plant, Anja Bless
article en
5 citations

Abstract

‘Regenerative agriculture’ is attracting increasing attention as a farming approach which could rejuvenate agricultural landscapes and support farmer wellbeing. However, regenerative agriculture's popularity in neoliberal economies such as Australia remains under-interrogated in terms of how this political-economic context might influence the adoption of regenerative practices. Furthermore, research on regenerative agriculture has largely focussed on individual farmer motivations for adopting regenerative agriculture and has failed to capture policymaker perspectives on the movement. Our research addresses these gaps by exploring the drivers of regenerative agriculture's growth in Australia based on 38 semi-structured interviews with policymakers and farmers. We then consider how policy settings have influenced these drivers through a content analysis of 244 documents related to regenerative agriculture from Australian governments. Our results highlight that while there is minimal explicit support among policymakers and institutions for regenerative agriculture, they remain enthusiastic about the economic and environmental co-benefits regenerative agriculture practices could provide, and capitalising upon them through nature markets. Our findings also demonstrate that economic factors are the primary driver of the growth of regenerative agriculture in Australia. In contrast with studies that emphasise eco-centric motivations for regenerative agriculture, our findings highlight how Australia's neoliberal policy setting is extending the commodification of nature and embedding extractivist, as opposed to reciprocal, human-nature value relations in the movement. We conclude with a discussion on how policy support based on principles of environmental stewardship and reciprocal relationality could instead sustain regenerative agriculture's growth without a reliance on economic incentives as a driver of change. • We interviewed policymakers and farmers on the drivers of regenerative agriculture's growth. • There is a lack of specific policy support for regenerative agriculture beyond nature markets. • Economic motivations were found to be a central driver for the uptake of regenerative agriculture. • Australia's neoliberal policy setting is influencing these outcomes. • Our findings challenge assumptions that regenerative farming is motivated by ecocentric values.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 118
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Australian Government, University of Technology Sydney
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Rural development and sustainability
24.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.