Priming effect of labile carbon on the decomposition of recalcitrant nitrogen via heterotrophic nitrification in a subtropical acidic forest soil

Recalcitrant organic nitrogen (N) decomposition is crucial for soil fertility and ecosystem function. Although it is well-established that plant root exudates, containing various labile carbon (C) sources, can stimulate recalcitrant N decomposition, the specific contribution of different labile C in driving this process through heterotrophic nitrification have yet to be fully elucidated. This study investigated the effects of simple C treatments—i.e., citric acid (CA), catechol (CT), and glucose (GLU); as well as combined carbon and nitrogen (C + N) treatments—i.e., glucose + ammonium sulphate (GSA), glucose + glycine (GA), glucosamine (ASS), and glycine (GLY)—on recalcitrant organic N heterotrophic nitrification (ONrec) and mineralization (MNrec) in a subtropical acidic forest soil. Inorganic nitrogen (as ammonium sulfate, SA) was included as a reference treatment for glycine (N treatment). The Ntrace model was employed to estimate the gross rate of ONrec and MNrec. Results unveiled that the highest ONrec developed in response to the C + N treatments (ranging from 0.143 to 1.953 mg N kg−1 d−1), followed by the N treatments (0.043 mg N kg−1 d−1), C treatments (ranging from 0.003 to 0.009 mg N kg−1 d−1), and the control (CK) (0.003 mg N kg−1 d−1). The positive impact of C + N treatments on ONrec was primarily driven by an increase in soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), likely due to enhanced relative activity of C-:N-hydrolyzing extracellular enzymes (e.g. (CBH + BG):LAP)). Furthermore, the increased abundance of fungi and potential heterotrophic nitrifiers (e.g., Penicillium, Trichoderma, and Mortierella) in the C + N treatments also contributed to their higher ONrec rates. Conversely, the highest MNrec was observed in the N treatments (53.664 mg N kg−1 d−1), followed by the C + N treatments (ranging from 25.438 to 59.088 mg N kg−1 d−1), simple C treatments (ranging from 0.194 to 0.690 mg N kg−1 d−1), and CK (0.587 mg N kg−1 d−1). Unlike ONrec, MNrec was primarily driven by an increase in total nitrogen (TN), which fulfilled the N demand for most soil microorganisms. These findings redefined our understanding of recalcitrant N decomposition through the pathway of ONrec and MNrec, especially in plant-soil ecosystems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117327
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Priming effect of labile carbon on the decomposition of recalcitrant nitrogen via heterotrophic nitrification in a subtropical acidic forest soil

Yi Zhang, Christoph Müller, Jinbo Zhang, Siwen Du et al.
1 citations
Geoderma
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
article

Priming effect of labile carbon on the decomposition of recalcitrant nitrogen via heterotrophic nitrification in a subtropical acidic forest soil

Yi Zhang, Christoph Müller, Jinbo Zhang, Siwen Du, Weihong Jiang, Zucong Cai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recalcitrant organic nitrogen (N) decomposition is crucial for soil fertility and ecosystem function. Although it is well-established that plant root exudates, containing various labile carbon (C) sources, can stimulate recalcitrant N decomposition, the specific contribution of different labile C in driving this process through heterotrophic nitrification have yet to be fully elucidated. This study investigated the effects of simple C treatments—i.e., citric acid (CA), catechol (CT), and glucose (GLU); as well as combined carbon and nitrogen (C + N) treatments—i.e., glucose + ammonium sulphate (GSA), glucose + glycine (GA), glucosamine (ASS), and glycine (GLY)—on recalcitrant organic N heterotrophic nitrification (ONrec) and mineralization (MNrec) in a subtropical acidic forest soil. Inorganic nitrogen (as ammonium sulfate, SA) was included as a reference treatment for glycine (N treatment). The Ntrace model was employed to estimate the gross rate of ONrec and MNrec. Results unveiled that the highest ONrec developed in response to the C + N treatments (ranging from 0.143 to 1.953 mg N kg−1 d−1), followed by the N treatments (0.043 mg N kg−1 d−1), C treatments (ranging from 0.003 to 0.009 mg N kg−1 d−1), and the control (CK) (0.003 mg N kg−1 d−1). The positive impact of C + N treatments on ONrec was primarily driven by an increase in soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), likely due to enhanced relative activity of C-:N-hydrolyzing extracellular enzymes (e.g. (CBH + BG):LAP)). Furthermore, the increased abundance of fungi and potential heterotrophic nitrifiers (e.g., Penicillium, Trichoderma, and Mortierella) in the C + N treatments also contributed to their higher ONrec rates. Conversely, the highest MNrec was observed in the N treatments (53.664 mg N kg−1 d−1), followed by the C + N treatments (ranging from 25.438 to 59.088 mg N kg−1 d−1), simple C treatments (ranging from 0.194 to 0.690 mg N kg−1 d−1), and CK (0.587 mg N kg−1 d−1). Unlike ONrec, MNrec was primarily driven by an increase in total nitrogen (TN), which fulfilled the N demand for most soil microorganisms. These findings redefined our understanding of recalcitrant N decomposition through the pathway of ONrec and MNrec, especially in plant-soil ecosystems.

GeodermaVol. 458
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.