Unit commitment with bidirectional ramping constraints of flexibility retrofit thermal power unit

• Systematically model and analyze bidirectional ramping constraints in UC. • Propose three novel bidirectional ramping models: AFBR, InterDBR, IntraDBR. • Accurately and realistically depict dynamic ramping process under peak regulation. • Improve system dispatch scheduling security and economy via bidirectional ramping. • Enhance renewable integration while ensuring secure and economic scheduling. Flexibility retrofits of thermal power units have been widely implemented to improve power system balancing. These retrofits enable operation below the regular minimum output, known as deep peak regulation, to accommodate increasing renewable energy integration. Due to the inherent characteristics of thermal power units, ramp-up rates and ramp-down rates generally differ. Existing studies often overlook this difference by assuming equal ramping rates. To bridge this gap, this paper systematically models and analyses bidirectional ramping constraints in unit commitment (UC) models, providing a more accurate and realistic representation of the ramping process. Specifically, this paper proposes three innovative bidirectional ramping models. The first is the all-period fixed bidirectional ramping (AFBR) model, which assumes a constant ramp rate across all periods. The second model is the interperiod dynamic bidirectional ramping (InterDBR) model, which captures variations in ramping rates across different peak regulation states, including deep peak regulation with oil (DPRO), deep peak regulation (DPR), and regular peak regulation (RPR). These ramping rate adjustments are restricted to interperiod scheduling periods. The third is the intraperiod dynamic bidirectional ramping (IntraDBR) model, which considers transitions between DPRO, DPR, and RPR within an intraperiod scheduling period, thereby reflecting actual operational conditions of the unit. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed bidirectional ramping models on the IEEE 118-bus system and a real-world Ningxia Power Grid system. Results demonstrate that bidirectional ramping models more accurately and effectively support dispatch scheduling decisions, improving system security and economic efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110709
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unit commitment with bidirectional ramping constraints of flexibility retrofit thermal power unit

Kaifeng Zhang, Jingxiao Jiang, Jianhu Lv, Yanran Zhu et al.
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Electric Power System Optimization
article

Unit commitment with bidirectional ramping constraints of flexibility retrofit thermal power unit

Kaifeng Zhang, Jingxiao Jiang, Jianhu Lv, Yanran Zhu, Xingyun Yan, Ying Wang, Xiaorui Guo, Jianxiang Qin
article en

Abstract

• Systematically model and analyze bidirectional ramping constraints in UC. • Propose three novel bidirectional ramping models: AFBR, InterDBR, IntraDBR. • Accurately and realistically depict dynamic ramping process under peak regulation. • Improve system dispatch scheduling security and economy via bidirectional ramping. • Enhance renewable integration while ensuring secure and economic scheduling. Flexibility retrofits of thermal power units have been widely implemented to improve power system balancing. These retrofits enable operation below the regular minimum output, known as deep peak regulation, to accommodate increasing renewable energy integration. Due to the inherent characteristics of thermal power units, ramp-up rates and ramp-down rates generally differ. Existing studies often overlook this difference by assuming equal ramping rates. To bridge this gap, this paper systematically models and analyses bidirectional ramping constraints in unit commitment (UC) models, providing a more accurate and realistic representation of the ramping process. Specifically, this paper proposes three innovative bidirectional ramping models. The first is the all-period fixed bidirectional ramping (AFBR) model, which assumes a constant ramp rate across all periods. The second model is the interperiod dynamic bidirectional ramping (InterDBR) model, which captures variations in ramping rates across different peak regulation states, including deep peak regulation with oil (DPRO), deep peak regulation (DPR), and regular peak regulation (RPR). These ramping rate adjustments are restricted to interperiod scheduling periods. The third is the intraperiod dynamic bidirectional ramping (IntraDBR) model, which considers transitions between DPRO, DPR, and RPR within an intraperiod scheduling period, thereby reflecting actual operational conditions of the unit. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed bidirectional ramping models on the IEEE 118-bus system and a real-world Ningxia Power Grid system. Results demonstrate that bidirectional ramping models more accurately and effectively support dispatch scheduling decisions, improving system security and economic efficiency.

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy SystemsVol. 168
China Electric Power Research Institute, Southeast University (CN)
State Grid Corporation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Electric Power System Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.