One Style Does Not Regulate All: Moderation Practices in Public and Private WhatsApp Groups

WhatsApp is the largest social media platform in the Global South and is a virulent force in global misinformation and political propaganda. Due to end-to-end encryption WhatsApp can barely review any content and mostly rely on volunteer moderation by group admins. Yet, little is known about how WhatsApp group admins manage their groups, what factors and values influence moderation decisions, and what challenges they face while managing their groups. To fill this gap, we interviewed admins of 32 diverse groups and reviewed content from 30 public groups in India and Bangladesh. We observed notable differences in the formation, members' behavior, and moderation of public versus private groups, as well as in how WhatsApp admins operate compared to those on other platforms. We used Baumrind's typology of 'parenting styles' as a lens to examine how admins enact care and control during volunteer moderation. We identified four styles based on how caring and controlling the admins are and discuss design recommendations to help them better manage problematic content in WhatsApp groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711042
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Style Does Not Regulate All: Moderation Practices in Public and Private WhatsApp Groups

D. P. Agarwal, Farhana Shahid, Aditya Vashistha
5 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
9.92
article

One Style Does Not Regulate All: Moderation Practices in Public and Private WhatsApp Groups

D. P. Agarwal, Farhana Shahid, Aditya Vashistha
article en
5 citations

Abstract

WhatsApp is the largest social media platform in the Global South and is a virulent force in global misinformation and political propaganda. Due to end-to-end encryption WhatsApp can barely review any content and mostly rely on volunteer moderation by group admins. Yet, little is known about how WhatsApp group admins manage their groups, what factors and values influence moderation decisions, and what challenges they face while managing their groups. To fill this gap, we interviewed admins of 32 diverse groups and reviewed content from 30 public groups in India and Bangladesh. We observed notable differences in the formation, members' behavior, and moderation of public versus private groups, as well as in how WhatsApp admins operate compared to those on other platforms. We used Baumrind's typology of 'parenting styles' as a lens to examine how admins enact care and control during volunteer moderation. We identified four styles based on how caring and controlling the admins are and discuss design recommendations to help them better manage problematic content in WhatsApp groups.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(2)
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One Style Does Not Regulate All: Moderation Practices in Public and Private WhatsApp Groups — D. P. Agarwal, Farhana Shahid, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS