Lions and Tigers and Bears—Wait, Why?

Modern zoos and aquaria are sites of education, recreation, research, and conservation; they are also the result of thousands of years of human-animal interaction, colonial expansion, and imperial violence. Beginning with the similar but not identical menagerie, this paper historically situates customs and ideologies to demonstrate how the zoo genre has changed over time. A brief review of academic, grey, professional, and community literature explores critical perspectives on contemporary animal display practices. Though North American zoos have come a long way from the concrete pits and metal bars of the 19th and 20th centuries—and it is important to recognize that the people working in zoos and aquaria do critically important work—I argue that contemporary zoo exhibitions still act as a manifestation of these legacies when they remove tangible reminders of human contact and interference with animals and other non-human beings. Through an analysis of exhibit design at a zoo and an aquarium in Canada, this paper explores how animal exhibits at zoos and aquaria may maintain a colonial gaze in their dominant positioning of human visitors. Elder Albert Marshall’s “Two-Eyed Seeing” framework shows us how we might reimagine these practices with both Indigenous and mainstream Western ways of knowing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of Information
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33137/ijournal.v10i2.45418
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lions and Tigers and Bears—Wait, Why?

Olivia Fraser Barsby
The iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of Information
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Lions and Tigers and Bears—Wait, Why?

Olivia Fraser Barsby
article en

Abstract

Modern zoos and aquaria are sites of education, recreation, research, and conservation; they are also the result of thousands of years of human-animal interaction, colonial expansion, and imperial violence. Beginning with the similar but not identical menagerie, this paper historically situates customs and ideologies to demonstrate how the zoo genre has changed over time. A brief review of academic, grey, professional, and community literature explores critical perspectives on contemporary animal display practices. Though North American zoos have come a long way from the concrete pits and metal bars of the 19th and 20th centuries—and it is important to recognize that the people working in zoos and aquaria do critically important work—I argue that contemporary zoo exhibitions still act as a manifestation of these legacies when they remove tangible reminders of human contact and interference with animals and other non-human beings. Through an analysis of exhibit design at a zoo and an aquarium in Canada, this paper explores how animal exhibits at zoos and aquaria may maintain a colonial gaze in their dominant positioning of human visitors. Elder Albert Marshall’s “Two-Eyed Seeing” framework shows us how we might reimagine these practices with both Indigenous and mainstream Western ways of knowing.

The iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of InformationVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.