Scientific Computing Energy Footprinting Across CPU Generations

A multi-dimensional study of the energy footprint for scientific computing across CPU generations is presented. The study utilizes a version of the popular Linpack benchmark, which is analogous to the HPL (High Performance Linpack) used today for TOP500 Supercomputer ranking, as a proxy for the computational performance of scientific computing. Here, this Linpack benchmark is applied to three generations of (the same level of) Intel x86 CPUs. Energy consumption of the benchmark's computation is considered via exploitation of onboard monitors. By considering metrics for power usage, time, and computational productivity in conjunction with computational strategies and runtime conditions, this study delivers guidance for achievement of computation goals related to computation time and energy consumption. Tradeoffs between these two, including marginal energy costs and time benefits for computational performance improvement, are also explored. Results for a wide array of experiments are reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3680256.3721314
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific Computing Energy Footprinting Across CPU Generations

Jacob D. Hauenstein, Timothy S. Newman
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
article

Scientific Computing Energy Footprinting Across CPU Generations

Jacob D. Hauenstein, Timothy S. Newman
article en

Abstract

A multi-dimensional study of the energy footprint for scientific computing across CPU generations is presented. The study utilizes a version of the popular Linpack benchmark, which is analogous to the HPL (High Performance Linpack) used today for TOP500 Supercomputer ranking, as a proxy for the computational performance of scientific computing. Here, this Linpack benchmark is applied to three generations of (the same level of) Intel x86 CPUs. Energy consumption of the benchmark's computation is considered via exploitation of onboard monitors. By considering metrics for power usage, time, and computational productivity in conjunction with computational strategies and runtime conditions, this study delivers guidance for achievement of computation goals related to computation time and energy consumption. Tradeoffs between these two, including marginal energy costs and time benefits for computational performance improvement, are also explored. Results for a wide array of experiments are reported.

University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scientific Computing Energy Footprinting Across CPU Generations — Jacob D. Hauenstein, Timothy S. Newman · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS