Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval

Estimating building heights is essential for urban planning, disaster assessment, and sustainable development. While the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) was primarily designed for forest measurements, it also holds potential for large-scale building height retrieval. This study evaluates the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A version 2 (V2) data for building height retrieval by comparing it with the airborne LiDAR-derived normalized digital surface model (nDSM). To ensure data reliability, we refined the GEDI dataset by excluding footprints outside buildings, filtering out low-quality footprints, removing footprints failing to detect ground elevation using the interquartile range (IQR) detection method, and excluding footprints with geolocation errors through an eight-direction offset approach. We assessed the effectiveness of different relative height (RH) metrics and systematically analyzed key influential factors in building height retrieval. Results indicate that GEDI RH96 achieves the highest correlation with reference building heights (R2 = 0.82, MAE = 1.67 m, RMSE = 4.40 m, rRMSE = 34.46%). GEDI demonstrates the highest accuracy for mid- and high-rise buildings, whereas low-rise buildings (<5 m) exhibit lower accuracy and tend to be overestimated (RMSE = 2.17 m, rRMSE = 49.79%). Sensitivity and slope are the most significant factors influencing the accuracy of building height retrieval. GEDI data with sensitivity above 0.95 showed a 4.66% decrease in rRMSE compared to data with sensitivity above 0.90. Slope negatively affects building height retrieval accuracy. Building roof type has a moderate impact; flat-roof buildings exhibit a slight advantage over pitched- and curved-roof buildings, with rRMSE reductions of 1.86% and 4.74%, respectively. Neither GEDI beam type nor data acquisition time significantly affect the accuracy of height retrieval. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for optimizing GEDI data in building height retrieval, contributing to large-scale building height mapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2498785
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval

Peimin Chen, Zhenbang Wu, Na Dong, Peng Qin et al.
1 citations
GIScience & Remote Sensing
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
2.35
article

Unveiling the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A for building height retrieval

Peimin Chen, Zhenbang Wu, Na Dong, Peng Qin, Zixuan Wang, Chong Liu, Jie Wang, Huabing Huang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Estimating building heights is essential for urban planning, disaster assessment, and sustainable development. While the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) was primarily designed for forest measurements, it also holds potential for large-scale building height retrieval. This study evaluates the performance and influential factors of GEDI L2A version 2 (V2) data for building height retrieval by comparing it with the airborne LiDAR-derived normalized digital surface model (nDSM). To ensure data reliability, we refined the GEDI dataset by excluding footprints outside buildings, filtering out low-quality footprints, removing footprints failing to detect ground elevation using the interquartile range (IQR) detection method, and excluding footprints with geolocation errors through an eight-direction offset approach. We assessed the effectiveness of different relative height (RH) metrics and systematically analyzed key influential factors in building height retrieval. Results indicate that GEDI RH96 achieves the highest correlation with reference building heights (R2 = 0.82, MAE = 1.67 m, RMSE = 4.40 m, rRMSE = 34.46%). GEDI demonstrates the highest accuracy for mid- and high-rise buildings, whereas low-rise buildings (<5 m) exhibit lower accuracy and tend to be overestimated (RMSE = 2.17 m, rRMSE = 49.79%). Sensitivity and slope are the most significant factors influencing the accuracy of building height retrieval. GEDI data with sensitivity above 0.95 showed a 4.66% decrease in rRMSE compared to data with sensitivity above 0.90. Slope negatively affects building height retrieval accuracy. Building roof type has a moderate impact; flat-roof buildings exhibit a slight advantage over pitched- and curved-roof buildings, with rRMSE reductions of 1.86% and 4.74%, respectively. Neither GEDI beam type nor data acquisition time significantly affect the accuracy of height retrieval. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for optimizing GEDI data in building height retrieval, contributing to large-scale building height mapping.

GIScience & Remote SensingVol. 62(1)
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (CN), Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.