Institutional ownership and stock liquidity during the COVID-19 crisis: a global perspective

Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between institutional ownership and stock liquidity during the economic crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach We analyze a sample of 37,870 non-financial publicly listed firms from 39 countries over the period 2010–2020. To capture potential differences between economic conditions, the sample is divided into two periods: the pre-COVID-19 (non-crisis) period and the COVID-19 crisis period. Findings Our findings indicate that institutional ownership has a positive impact on stock liquidity, even during the adverse economic conditions triggered by COVID-19. However, the positive association between institutional ownership and stock liquidity is attenuated during the COVID-19 crisis, mirroring results observed during the October 19, 1987, stock market crash (Amihud et al ., 1990). Further analyses reveal that the effect of institutional holdings on stock liquidity is more pronounced in countries less affected by COVID-19. Additionally, the positive impact of institutional ownership on stock liquidity is weaker in countries with stronger institutional environments and more robust in those with weaker institutional frameworks. Originality/value This study represents the first comprehensive exploration of how the COVID-19 crisis has influenced the relationship between institutional ownership and stock liquidity within an international context. By examining this association across diverse markets, the study aims to shed light on the dynamic interplay between institutional investors and stock liquidity during one of the most disruptive global events in modern financial history.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Behavioral Finance
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rbf-04-2024-0107
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional ownership and stock liquidity during the COVID-19 crisis: a global perspective

Mieszko Mazur, Nguyen Tram Anh Tran, Thi Thuy Anh Vo
Review of Behavioral Finance
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Institutional ownership and stock liquidity during the COVID-19 crisis: a global perspective

Mieszko Mazur, Nguyen Tram Anh Tran, Thi Thuy Anh Vo
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between institutional ownership and stock liquidity during the economic crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Design/methodology/approach We analyze a sample of 37,870 non-financial publicly listed firms from 39 countries over the period 2010–2020. To capture potential differences between economic conditions, the sample is divided into two periods: the pre-COVID-19 (non-crisis) period and the COVID-19 crisis period. Findings Our findings indicate that institutional ownership has a positive impact on stock liquidity, even during the adverse economic conditions triggered by COVID-19. However, the positive association between institutional ownership and stock liquidity is attenuated during the COVID-19 crisis, mirroring results observed during the October 19, 1987, stock market crash (Amihud et al ., 1990). Further analyses reveal that the effect of institutional holdings on stock liquidity is more pronounced in countries less affected by COVID-19. Additionally, the positive impact of institutional ownership on stock liquidity is weaker in countries with stronger institutional environments and more robust in those with weaker institutional frameworks. Originality/value This study represents the first comprehensive exploration of how the COVID-19 crisis has influenced the relationship between institutional ownership and stock liquidity within an international context. By examining this association across diverse markets, the study aims to shed light on the dynamic interplay between institutional investors and stock liquidity during one of the most disruptive global events in modern financial history.

Review of Behavioral FinanceVol. 17(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.