Assessment of the Scalpel Blade as an Objective Tool for Measuring Dermatome Cut Thickness

Dermatomes are widely used for split-thickness skin graft harvest. The graft thickness depends in part on the cut thickness setting, adjusted by the surgeon using a lever on the dermatome. This study aimed to assess whether a #15 scalpel blade placed in the dermatome blade aperture may reliably confirm the cut thickness setting (the scalpel dermatome test). Discrepancies between the blade-measured aperture and the cut thickness setting and the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the technique were evaluated. The thickness of ten #15 blades (n = 10) was measured using a micrometer. Six dermatomes were each assessed by 2 surgeons in triplicate each for the narrowest cut thickness setting that would permit passage of an entire surgical blade through the dermatome blade aperture, starting at zero and increasing cut thickness intervals of 1/1000 in. The mean scalpel blade thickness was 0.391 mm (~15/1000 in.). The mean cut thickness setting that would permit the blade was 6/1000 in. (range 2-9), P < 0.001. Intra-observer reliability was good (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.89). Inter-observer reliability was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.52) and a mean difference of 1.5/1000 in. was observed (6.8 vs 5.2, t-test P < .018). Individual dermatome apertures differed, with the mean of 3 measurements for each ranging from 5.0 to 7.8/1000 in, P < .001. Differences exist between scalpel blades, dermatomes, and surgeons, however, intra-observer reliability is good. The test is a simple maneuver, which can objectively validate the dermatome blade aperture, thereby preventing harm and optimizing graft thickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf067
Primary Topic
Skin Protection and Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Scalpel Blade as an Objective Tool for Measuring Dermatome Cut Thickness

Sebastian Q Vrouwe, Dallan Dargan, Lawrence J. Gottlieb
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Skin Protection and Aging
article

Assessment of the Scalpel Blade as an Objective Tool for Measuring Dermatome Cut Thickness

Sebastian Q Vrouwe, Dallan Dargan, Lawrence J. Gottlieb
article en

Abstract

Dermatomes are widely used for split-thickness skin graft harvest. The graft thickness depends in part on the cut thickness setting, adjusted by the surgeon using a lever on the dermatome. This study aimed to assess whether a #15 scalpel blade placed in the dermatome blade aperture may reliably confirm the cut thickness setting (the scalpel dermatome test). Discrepancies between the blade-measured aperture and the cut thickness setting and the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the technique were evaluated. The thickness of ten #15 blades (n = 10) was measured using a micrometer. Six dermatomes were each assessed by 2 surgeons in triplicate each for the narrowest cut thickness setting that would permit passage of an entire surgical blade through the dermatome blade aperture, starting at zero and increasing cut thickness intervals of 1/1000 in. The mean scalpel blade thickness was 0.391 mm (~15/1000 in.). The mean cut thickness setting that would permit the blade was 6/1000 in. (range 2-9), P < 0.001. Intra-observer reliability was good (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.89). Inter-observer reliability was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.52) and a mean difference of 1.5/1000 in. was observed (6.8 vs 5.2, t-test P < .018). Individual dermatome apertures differed, with the mean of 3 measurements for each ranging from 5.0 to 7.8/1000 in, P < .001. Differences exist between scalpel blades, dermatomes, and surgeons, however, intra-observer reliability is good. The test is a simple maneuver, which can objectively validate the dermatome blade aperture, thereby preventing harm and optimizing graft thickness.

Journal of Burn Care & ResearchVol. 46(4)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Skin Protection and Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.