Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Referred for Orthodontic Treatment

This cross-sectional study of the cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients referred for orthodontic treatment from year 2010 to 2021, reviewed the dental records retrospectively. The demographic data, the pattern of CLP, and the dental anomalies were recorded. All variables were analysed descriptively. The differences between the gender with respect of the dental anomalies were tested using Fisher’s exact test. The mean age of the patients at the time of referral was 12.12 ± 0.48 years. There were 84 (98.82%) patients presented with at least one dental anomaly. More than one-third of the patients presented with more than a type of dental anomaly (n=39, 45.88%). The most common dental anomalies were hypodontia (n=58, 68.24%), peg-shaped lateral incisor (n=29, 34.12%), impacted tooth (n=27, 31.76%), supernumerary (n=10, 11.76%), and transposition (n=8, 9.41%). The prevalence of hypodontia was higher in females. The prevalence of impacted tooth, supernumerary, and transposition were higher in males. The prevalence of peg-shaped lateral incisor was about the same in males and females. In conclusion, almost all of the CLP patients referred for orthodontic treatment had at least one dental anomaly, with the prevalence of 98.82%. Multiple dental anomalies affected more than one-third of the patients. Hypodontia was the most common dental anomaly. Other dental anomalies were peg-shaped lateral incisor, impacted tooth, supernumerary, and transposition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v19i2.5488
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Referred for Orthodontic Treatment

Jin Han Lee
Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Referred for Orthodontic Treatment

Jin Han Lee
article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study of the cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients referred for orthodontic treatment from year 2010 to 2021, reviewed the dental records retrospectively. The demographic data, the pattern of CLP, and the dental anomalies were recorded. All variables were analysed descriptively. The differences between the gender with respect of the dental anomalies were tested using Fisher’s exact test. The mean age of the patients at the time of referral was 12.12 ± 0.48 years. There were 84 (98.82%) patients presented with at least one dental anomaly. More than one-third of the patients presented with more than a type of dental anomaly (n=39, 45.88%). The most common dental anomalies were hypodontia (n=58, 68.24%), peg-shaped lateral incisor (n=29, 34.12%), impacted tooth (n=27, 31.76%), supernumerary (n=10, 11.76%), and transposition (n=8, 9.41%). The prevalence of hypodontia was higher in females. The prevalence of impacted tooth, supernumerary, and transposition were higher in males. The prevalence of peg-shaped lateral incisor was about the same in males and females. In conclusion, almost all of the CLP patients referred for orthodontic treatment had at least one dental anomaly, with the prevalence of 98.82%. Multiple dental anomalies affected more than one-third of the patients. Hypodontia was the most common dental anomaly. Other dental anomalies were peg-shaped lateral incisor, impacted tooth, supernumerary, and transposition.

Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)Vol. 19(2)
Queen Elizabeth II Hospital (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.