Attachment Styles and Preferences for AI: Practical Tool or Emotional Support?

This study investigates how attachment styles regulate the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an emotional tool. By employing a mixed method approach, 100 participants will be chosen for the survey and interview. The data for demographics, AI usage, and attachment styles are analyzed using instrumental scales such as Practical Tool Scores (PTS) and Emotional Support Scores (ESS). The results reveal that younger participants prefer the practical use of AI applications: ChatGPT and Siri. Minimum demographic influence is observed in regression analysis, which posits PTS as the major driver of AI engagement. Utilitarian use of AI is popular even for those who need emotional support. Conversely, females showed a slightly higher inclination towards using AI as a tool for emotional assistance. Though this study lacks focus on psychological factor, it contributes to usage of AI for emotion management. Future research demands longitudinal studies to examine other factors altering AI preferences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56557/jogress/2025/v19i29287
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attachment Styles and Preferences for AI: Practical Tool or Emotional Support?

Zhongtian Bao
Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Attachment Styles and Preferences for AI: Practical Tool or Emotional Support?

Zhongtian Bao
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how attachment styles regulate the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an emotional tool. By employing a mixed method approach, 100 participants will be chosen for the survey and interview. The data for demographics, AI usage, and attachment styles are analyzed using instrumental scales such as Practical Tool Scores (PTS) and Emotional Support Scores (ESS). The results reveal that younger participants prefer the practical use of AI applications: ChatGPT and Siri. Minimum demographic influence is observed in regression analysis, which posits PTS as the major driver of AI engagement. Utilitarian use of AI is popular even for those who need emotional support. Conversely, females showed a slightly higher inclination towards using AI as a tool for emotional assistance. Though this study lacks focus on psychological factor, it contributes to usage of AI for emotion management. Future research demands longitudinal studies to examine other factors altering AI preferences.

Journal of Global Research in Education and Social ScienceVol. 19(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Attachment Styles and Preferences for AI: Practical Tool or Emotional Support? — Zhongtian Bao · Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS