Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device

Flexible ureteroscopy is a cornerstone in minimally invasive urology, providing effective management of kidney stones and other urological conditions. The emergence of single-use ureteroscopes addresses challenges associated with reusable devices, such as cross-contamination, maintenance costs, and degradation over time. This prospective, single-center study compared the performance of the 6.3 Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope to the 7.5 Fr model in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 2 cm. Forty patients were divided into two groups of 20, with preoperative assessments including CT scans and urine cultures. All patients underwent flexible ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy under general anesthesia, and stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed via CT at one month postoperatively. The 6.3 Fr ureteroscope achieved a significantly higher SFR of 95% compared to 92.9% with the 7.5 Fr model (p = 0.042). Mean operative times were 58 min (6.3 Fr) vs. 62.5 min (7.5 Fr), with no statistically significant differences in laser time or total energy used. Energy efficiency was 0.047 mm<sup>3</sup>/J (6.3 Fr) vs. 0.035 mm<sup>3</sup>/J (7.5 Fr), while energy consumption was 20.89 J/mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 28.34 J/mm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Both devices exhibited low complication rates, with only minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2) reported. Postoperative ureteral mucosal injury was assessed intraoperatively, and no cases exceeded Grade 1. This study highlights the safety and efficacy of the 6.3 Fr ureteroscope, demonstrating comparable or superior outcomes to the 7.5 Fr model in terms of SFR and operative time. While economic and sterility benefits were not evaluated, the findings support the adoption of smaller-diameter devices for minimally invasive procedures, though further studies are warranted to validate their broader clinical impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00515-3
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device

Ana-Maria Andreea Punga, Bogdan Florin GEAVLETE, C. Bulai, C. Ene et al.
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
12.15
article

Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device

Ana-Maria Andreea Punga, Bogdan Florin GEAVLETE, C. Bulai, C. Ene, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, R. Multescu, Adrian Militaru
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy is a cornerstone in minimally invasive urology, providing effective management of kidney stones and other urological conditions. The emergence of single-use ureteroscopes addresses challenges associated with reusable devices, such as cross-contamination, maintenance costs, and degradation over time. This prospective, single-center study compared the performance of the 6.3 Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope to the 7.5 Fr model in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 2 cm. Forty patients were divided into two groups of 20, with preoperative assessments including CT scans and urine cultures. All patients underwent flexible ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy under general anesthesia, and stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed via CT at one month postoperatively. The 6.3 Fr ureteroscope achieved a significantly higher SFR of 95% compared to 92.9% with the 7.5 Fr model (p = 0.042). Mean operative times were 58 min (6.3 Fr) vs. 62.5 min (7.5 Fr), with no statistically significant differences in laser time or total energy used. Energy efficiency was 0.047 mm<sup>3</sup>/J (6.3 Fr) vs. 0.035 mm<sup>3</sup>/J (7.5 Fr), while energy consumption was 20.89 J/mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 28.34 J/mm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Both devices exhibited low complication rates, with only minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2) reported. Postoperative ureteral mucosal injury was assessed intraoperatively, and no cases exceeded Grade 1. This study highlights the safety and efficacy of the 6.3 Fr ureteroscope, demonstrating comparable or superior outcomes to the 7.5 Fr model in terms of SFR and operative time. While economic and sterility benefits were not evaluated, the findings support the adoption of smaller-diameter devices for minimally invasive procedures, though further studies are warranted to validate their broader clinical impact.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
12.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.