A tissue-specific atlas of protein–protein associations enables prioritization of candidate disease genes

Despite progress in mapping protein-protein interactions, their tissue specificity is understudied. Here, given that protein coabundance is predictive of functional association, we compiled and analyzed protein abundance data of 7,811 proteomic samples from 11 human tissues to produce an atlas of tissue-specific protein associations. We find that this method recapitulates known protein complexes and the larger structural organization of the cell. Interactions of stable protein complexes are well preserved across tissues, while cell-type-specific cellular structures, such as synaptic components, are found to represent a substantial driver of differences between tissues. Over 25% of associations are tissue specific, of which <7% are because of differences in gene expression. We validate protein associations for the brain through cofractionation experiments in synaptosomes, curation of brain-derived pulldown data and AlphaFold2 modeling. We also construct a network of brain interactions for schizophrenia-related genes, indicating that our approach can functionally prioritize candidate disease genes in loci linked to brain disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02659-z
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A tissue-specific atlas of protein–protein associations enables prioritization of candidate disease genes

Matthias Gstaiger, Kalpana Panneerselvam, Andrea Fossati, Delora Baptista et al.
15 citations
Nature Biotechnology
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
12.09
article

A tissue-specific atlas of protein–protein associations enables prioritization of candidate disease genes

Matthias Gstaiger, Kalpana Panneerselvam, Andrea Fossati, Delora Baptista, Danish Memon, Sandra Orchard, Diederik S. Laman Trip, Marc van Oostrum, Luana Licata, Pedro Beltrão, Fabian Frommelt, Ruedi Aebersold, Ellen M. McDonagh, Henning Hermjakob, Bernd Wollscheid, Gosia Trynka, Glyn Bradley
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Despite progress in mapping protein-protein interactions, their tissue specificity is understudied. Here, given that protein coabundance is predictive of functional association, we compiled and analyzed protein abundance data of 7,811 proteomic samples from 11 human tissues to produce an atlas of tissue-specific protein associations. We find that this method recapitulates known protein complexes and the larger structural organization of the cell. Interactions of stable protein complexes are well preserved across tissues, while cell-type-specific cellular structures, such as synaptic components, are found to represent a substantial driver of differences between tissues. Over 25% of associations are tissue specific, of which <7% are because of differences in gene expression. We validate protein associations for the brain through cofractionation experiments in synaptosomes, curation of brain-derived pulldown data and AlphaFold2 modeling. We also construct a network of brain interactions for schizophrenia-related genes, indicating that our approach can functionally prioritize candidate disease genes in loci linked to brain disorders.

Nature Biotechnology
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH), European Bioinformatics Institute (GB), University of Basel (CH), Age UK (GB), Science for Life Laboratory (SE), Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), ETH Zurich (CH), Open Targets (GB), Bioinformatics Institute (RU), Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (PT)
European Bioinformatics Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
12.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.