Comparison of Methods for Obtaining Graphene Structures

Three methods for obtaining graphene structures have been investigated: ultrasonic liquid-phase exfoliation (20–60 min), mechanical treatment in a vibratory cup mill, and Hammer’s method. An ultrasonic processing in a polyacrylonitrile/dimethylformamide solution led to a decrease in the particle size from 25.3 to 9.57 µm; the fraction of (5–20)-µm particles reached 68%, and the fraction of particles smaller than 1 µm was 2.69%. According to the atomic force microscopy data, the layer height reduced from 1.1 µm to 100 nm, and the fraction of large aggregates (>100 µm) decreased from 40 to 10%. Mechanical exfoliation with polyacrylonitrile increased the interlayer spacing to 3.609 Å in comparison with 3.373–3.376 Å, a value obtained by ultrasonic treatment. Hammer’s method demonstrated the best exfoliation (according to the X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy data): ID/IG = 1, I2D/IG = 0.07, $${{I}_{{\left( {D + D'} \right)}}}$$ /IG = 0.12. Molecular modeling revealed a decrease in the specific energy of the system from 351.68 to 200.21 J/g with an increase in the C : O ratio from 38 : 1 to 111 : 1, reaching a minimum of 10.780 J/g for pure graphene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crystallography Reports
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063774525600152
Primary Topic
Graphene research and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Methods for Obtaining Graphene Structures

А. И. Риль, М. A. Sitnov, А. В. Тимофеев, M. V. Chichkov et al.
Crystallography Reports
Graphene research and applications
article

Comparison of Methods for Obtaining Graphene Structures

А. И. Риль, М. A. Sitnov, А. В. Тимофеев, M. V. Chichkov, V. V. Kozlov, Sergey B. Nechushkin
article en

Abstract

Three methods for obtaining graphene structures have been investigated: ultrasonic liquid-phase exfoliation (20–60 min), mechanical treatment in a vibratory cup mill, and Hammer’s method. An ultrasonic processing in a polyacrylonitrile/dimethylformamide solution led to a decrease in the particle size from 25.3 to 9.57 µm; the fraction of (5–20)-µm particles reached 68%, and the fraction of particles smaller than 1 µm was 2.69%. According to the atomic force microscopy data, the layer height reduced from 1.1 µm to 100 nm, and the fraction of large aggregates (>100 µm) decreased from 40 to 10%. Mechanical exfoliation with polyacrylonitrile increased the interlayer spacing to 3.609 Å in comparison with 3.373–3.376 Å, a value obtained by ultrasonic treatment. Hammer’s method demonstrated the best exfoliation (according to the X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy data): ID/IG = 1, I2D/IG = 0.07, $${{I}_{{\left( {D + D'} \right)}}}$$ /IG = 0.12. Molecular modeling revealed a decrease in the specific energy of the system from 351.68 to 200.21 J/g with an increase in the C : O ratio from 38 : 1 to 111 : 1, reaching a minimum of 10.780 J/g for pure graphene.

Crystallography ReportsVol. 69(S1)
National University of Science and Technology (RU), NS Kurnakova Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Graphene research and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.