Performance Evaluation of Monocular Markerless Pose Estimation Systems for Industrial Exoskeletons

Industrial exoskeletons (a.k.a. wearable robots) have been developed to reduce musculoskeletal fatigue and work injuries. Human joint kinematics and human-robot alignment are important measurements in understanding the effects of industrial exoskeletons. Recently, markerless pose estimation systems based on monocular color (red, green, blue-RGB) and depth cameras are being used to estimate human joint positions. This study analyzes the performance of monocular markerless pose estimation systems on human skeletal joint estimation while wearing exoskeletons. Two pose estimation systems producing RGB and depth images from ten viewpoints are evaluated for one subject in 14 industrial poses. The experiment was repeated for three different types of exoskeletons on the same subject. An optical tracking system (OTS) was used as a reference system. The image acceptance rate was 56% for the RGB, 22% for the depth, and 78% for the OTS pose estimation system. The key sources of pose estimation error were the occlusions from the exoskeletons, industrial poses, and viewpoints. The reference system showed decreased performance when the optical markers were occluded by the exoskeleton or when the markers' position shifted with the exoskeleton. This study performs a systematic comparison of two types of monocular markerless pose estimation systems and an optical tracking system, as well as a proposed metric, based on a tracking quality ratio, to assess whether a skeletal joint estimation would be acceptable for human kinematics analysis in exoskeleton studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25092877
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Monocular Markerless Pose Estimation Systems for Industrial Exoskeletons

Roger Bostelman, Ann Virts, Ya-Shian Li-Baboud, Mili Shah et al.
2 citations
Sensors
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
1.35
article

Performance Evaluation of Monocular Markerless Pose Estimation Systems for Industrial Exoskeletons

Roger Bostelman, Ann Virts, Ya-Shian Li-Baboud, Mili Shah, Soocheol Yoon, Nishat Ahmed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Industrial exoskeletons (a.k.a. wearable robots) have been developed to reduce musculoskeletal fatigue and work injuries. Human joint kinematics and human-robot alignment are important measurements in understanding the effects of industrial exoskeletons. Recently, markerless pose estimation systems based on monocular color (red, green, blue-RGB) and depth cameras are being used to estimate human joint positions. This study analyzes the performance of monocular markerless pose estimation systems on human skeletal joint estimation while wearing exoskeletons. Two pose estimation systems producing RGB and depth images from ten viewpoints are evaluated for one subject in 14 industrial poses. The experiment was repeated for three different types of exoskeletons on the same subject. An optical tracking system (OTS) was used as a reference system. The image acceptance rate was 56% for the RGB, 22% for the depth, and 78% for the OTS pose estimation system. The key sources of pose estimation error were the occlusions from the exoskeletons, industrial poses, and viewpoints. The reference system showed decreased performance when the optical markers were occluded by the exoskeleton or when the markers' position shifted with the exoskeleton. This study performs a systematic comparison of two types of monocular markerless pose estimation systems and an optical tracking system, as well as a proposed metric, based on a tracking quality ratio, to assess whether a skeletal joint estimation would be acceptable for human kinematics analysis in exoskeleton studies.

SensorsVol. 25(9)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Trout Unlimited (US), Georgetown University (US), Cooper Union (US)
Georgetown University, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.