In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate‐Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets

Abstract This paper investigates how corporate‐led renewable electricity (RE) markets, shaped by voluntary initiatives and calculative devices, restructure energy governance. Using Taiwan's RE market as a case study and drawing on marketisation theory, it reveals how multinational corporations, in collaboration with state actors, embed power asymmetries into climate governance. These asymmetries marginalise smaller firms and local stakeholders, reinforcing unequal access to RE. The findings challenge the state–market dichotomy, showing how both actors co‐produce market rules through decentralised, yet uneven, governance. For scholars of environmental governance and energy policy, the paper offers a critical lens to assess how market instruments function not only as tools of coordination but also as mechanisms of exclusion. It argues for policy frameworks that explicitly address these asymmetries, and for practical interventions that democratise access to RE markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate‐Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets

Ker‐hsuan Chien
1 citations
Antipode
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
article

In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate‐Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets

Ker‐hsuan Chien
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates how corporate‐led renewable electricity (RE) markets, shaped by voluntary initiatives and calculative devices, restructure energy governance. Using Taiwan's RE market as a case study and drawing on marketisation theory, it reveals how multinational corporations, in collaboration with state actors, embed power asymmetries into climate governance. These asymmetries marginalise smaller firms and local stakeholders, reinforcing unequal access to RE. The findings challenge the state–market dichotomy, showing how both actors co‐produce market rules through decentralised, yet uneven, governance. For scholars of environmental governance and energy policy, the paper offers a critical lens to assess how market instruments function not only as tools of coordination but also as mechanisms of exclusion. It argues for policy frameworks that explicitly address these asymmetries, and for practical interventions that democratise access to RE markets.

AntipodeVol. 57(4)
National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate‐Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets — Ker‐hsuan Chien · Antipode (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS