Dynamic causal models in infectious disease epidemiology—an assessment of their predictive validity based on the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK 2020 to 2024

This technical report addresses the predictive validity of long-term epidemiological forecasting based upon dynamic causal modeling. It uses complementary prospective and retrospective analyses. The prospective analysis completes a series of (annual) reports comparing predictions with subsequent outcomes (i.e., cases, deaths, hospital admissions and Long COVID) reported a year later. Predictive validity is then addressed retrospectively by examining predictions at various points during the pandemic, in relation to actual outcomes at three, six and 12 months after the predictions were evaluated. This analysis suggests that-with a sufficiently expressive dynamic causal model-three, six and 12 month projections can be remarkably accurate (to within 10% or less of observed outcomes) at certain phases of the epidemic: namely, the initial phase-before the emergence of highly transmissible variants-and toward the end of the pandemic, when slow fluctuations in transmissibility and virulence can be estimated more precisely. However, the predictive accuracy in the intervening periods are compromised, to the extent that some forecasts only remain within their Bayesian credible intervals for 3 months. We provide a quantitative analysis of predictive accuracy for future reference and discuss the implications for epidemiological modeling, and forecasting, of this sort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1573783
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic causal models in infectious disease epidemiology—an assessment of their predictive validity based on the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK 2020 to 2024

Cameron Bowie, Karl Friston
1 citations
Frontiers in Public Health
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
article

Dynamic causal models in infectious disease epidemiology—an assessment of their predictive validity based on the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK 2020 to 2024

Cameron Bowie, Karl Friston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This technical report addresses the predictive validity of long-term epidemiological forecasting based upon dynamic causal modeling. It uses complementary prospective and retrospective analyses. The prospective analysis completes a series of (annual) reports comparing predictions with subsequent outcomes (i.e., cases, deaths, hospital admissions and Long COVID) reported a year later. Predictive validity is then addressed retrospectively by examining predictions at various points during the pandemic, in relation to actual outcomes at three, six and 12 months after the predictions were evaluated. This analysis suggests that-with a sufficiently expressive dynamic causal model-three, six and 12 month projections can be remarkably accurate (to within 10% or less of observed outcomes) at certain phases of the epidemic: namely, the initial phase-before the emergence of highly transmissible variants-and toward the end of the pandemic, when slow fluctuations in transmissibility and virulence can be estimated more precisely. However, the predictive accuracy in the intervening periods are compromised, to the extent that some forecasts only remain within their Bayesian credible intervals for 3 months. We provide a quantitative analysis of predictive accuracy for future reference and discuss the implications for epidemiological modeling, and forecasting, of this sort.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
North Devon District Hospital (GB), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), University College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.