Operationalising an integrated mortality transition framework for programmatic priority setting across maternal and newborn health

Data-driven decision making will be instrumental in reducing maternal mortality, newborn mortality, and stillbirth levels in the coming years as the Sustainable Development Goal targets draw near in 2030. Tailoring evidence to be context-specific is crucial to target relevant questions, priorities, and needs. In doing so, there remains value in grounding local data in the broader global health data landscape. Here, we introduce one resource - an interactive benchmarking tool- that presents local insights contextualized in a maturity model based on evidence from over 150 countries. This tool positions a country in one of five mortality phases, compares its performance across maternal/newborn health program areas to peers in its phase, and facilitates connections to lessons from high-performing Exemplar countries that have achieved success on relevant indicators. It offers an opportunity to set evidence-based priorities, helping to identify indicators and subnational regions that may be important to target moving forward to accelerate progress. In select countries, the benchmarking approach has been piloted to inform maternal and newborn health evaluations and planning processes. This approach is adaptable to local contexts and use-cases, while in parallel fostering a shared way of thinking around maternal and newborn health strategic planning. In a global health financing environment that is increasingly constrained, such a tool to support data-driven priority setting is a timely resource.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018610
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operationalising an integrated mortality transition framework for programmatic priority setting across maternal and newborn health

Ties Boerma, Allisyn C. Moran, Ryan Fitzgerald, Uzma Syed et al.
2 citations
BMJ Global Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
6.99
article

Operationalising an integrated mortality transition framework for programmatic priority setting across maternal and newborn health

Ties Boerma, Allisyn C. Moran, Ryan Fitzgerald, Uzma Syed, Gloria Ikilezi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Data-driven decision making will be instrumental in reducing maternal mortality, newborn mortality, and stillbirth levels in the coming years as the Sustainable Development Goal targets draw near in 2030. Tailoring evidence to be context-specific is crucial to target relevant questions, priorities, and needs. In doing so, there remains value in grounding local data in the broader global health data landscape. Here, we introduce one resource - an interactive benchmarking tool- that presents local insights contextualized in a maturity model based on evidence from over 150 countries. This tool positions a country in one of five mortality phases, compares its performance across maternal/newborn health program areas to peers in its phase, and facilitates connections to lessons from high-performing Exemplar countries that have achieved success on relevant indicators. It offers an opportunity to set evidence-based priorities, helping to identify indicators and subnational regions that may be important to target moving forward to accelerate progress. In select countries, the benchmarking approach has been piloted to inform maternal and newborn health evaluations and planning processes. This approach is adaptable to local contexts and use-cases, while in parallel fostering a shared way of thinking around maternal and newborn health strategic planning. In a global health financing environment that is increasingly constrained, such a tool to support data-driven priority setting is a timely resource.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 10(5)
Gates (United States) (US), Manitoba Health (CA), World Health Organization (CH), BIO Ventures for Global Health (US)
World Health Organization, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Maternal and Child Health
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.