Monitoring the structure of restored forests and assessing aboveground carbon density through canopy metrics derived from digital aerial photogrammetry and <scp>LiDAR</scp>

Monitoring forest dynamics is crucial to understanding forest succession drivers and ensuring successful restoration outcomes. Laser scanners onboard robust drone systems are valuable for penetrating forest canopies and providing structural details. With the growing accessibility to low‐cost drones equipped with advanced optical sensors, photogrammetry emerges as a potential and cost‐effective alternative for monitoring forest restoration. Our goal was to explore the potential of monitoring tropical forest restoration sites using low‐cost drones as an alternative to airborne laser scanning. Using linear regression, we compared five canopy‐derived metrics as well as aboveground carbon density (AGCD) models fitted from mean canopy height. Data were collected over 30 plots of 900 m 2 sampled across restoration plantations of different ages. Results showed a strong relationship between both laser scans and low‐cost optical sensors for canopy metrics, with r 2 = 0.83–0.99, root mean squared error (RMSE) % = 5.41–27.25%, and mean absolute error (MAE) % = 3.81–16.41%. Central tendencies (e.g. mean height) were more reliably estimated, while metrics related to canopy height variation tended to be overestimated by optical sensors. The AGCD models showed little difference, with high r 2 values (0.87 and 0.86) and very similar estimated RMSE% (30.02 and 31.33%) and MAE% (25.15 and 25.37%), for both laser scanners and optical sensors, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that digital aerial photogrammetry can produce results comparable to laser scanning in assessing the canopy structure of restored forests, serving as a cost‐efficient alternative for restoration monitoring, particularly in regions with financial or logistical constraints for laser scanner surveys. However, optical data have limitations in capturing reliable terrain information in densely forested areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70077
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring the structure of restored forests and assessing aboveground carbon density through canopy metrics derived from digital aerial photogrammetry and LiDAR

Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida, Laury Cullen, Leo Haneda, Vagner Machado Costa et al.
Restoration Ecology
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Monitoring the structure of restored forests and assessing aboveground carbon density through canopy metrics derived from digital aerial photogrammetry and LiDAR

Danilo Roberti Alves de Almeida, Laury Cullen, Leo Haneda, Vagner Machado Costa, Paulo Guilherme Molin, Giulio Brossi Santoro, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Gisela Ferreira, José Matheus Segre Moneva Viveiros, Melodie Kern Sarubo Dorth Sinegalia, Carlos Alberto Silva
article en

Abstract

Monitoring forest dynamics is crucial to understanding forest succession drivers and ensuring successful restoration outcomes. Laser scanners onboard robust drone systems are valuable for penetrating forest canopies and providing structural details. With the growing accessibility to low‐cost drones equipped with advanced optical sensors, photogrammetry emerges as a potential and cost‐effective alternative for monitoring forest restoration. Our goal was to explore the potential of monitoring tropical forest restoration sites using low‐cost drones as an alternative to airborne laser scanning. Using linear regression, we compared five canopy‐derived metrics as well as aboveground carbon density (AGCD) models fitted from mean canopy height. Data were collected over 30 plots of 900 m 2 sampled across restoration plantations of different ages. Results showed a strong relationship between both laser scans and low‐cost optical sensors for canopy metrics, with r 2 = 0.83–0.99, root mean squared error (RMSE) % = 5.41–27.25%, and mean absolute error (MAE) % = 3.81–16.41%. Central tendencies (e.g. mean height) were more reliably estimated, while metrics related to canopy height variation tended to be overestimated by optical sensors. The AGCD models showed little difference, with high r 2 values (0.87 and 0.86) and very similar estimated RMSE% (30.02 and 31.33%) and MAE% (25.15 and 25.37%), for both laser scanners and optical sensors, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that digital aerial photogrammetry can produce results comparable to laser scanning in assessing the canopy structure of restored forests, serving as a cost‐efficient alternative for restoration monitoring, particularly in regions with financial or logistical constraints for laser scanner surveys. However, optical data have limitations in capturing reliable terrain information in densely forested areas.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(5)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Florida (US), Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (BR), Forest Science and Research Institute (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.