Boosting popularity: Folk theories and algorithmic resistance of visibility contests in the comment sections

This study examines the collective actions of Chinese netizens in contesting algorithm visibility through popularity-boosting comments. Employing a netnographic approach within the theoretical frameworks of algorithm resistance and folk theories, the research analyzes popularity-boosting comments ( N = 900) and discussions regarding these practices ( N = 492) on Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and Weibo. The findings reveal that algorithmic resistance effectively sustains the lifecycle of posts and extends their dissemination. Netizens primarily engage in this resistance along two pathways: Within and beyond the algorithmic framework. Within the framework, conflicting folk theories trigger netizens’ internal power struggles, undermining the consistency and continuity of collective algorithmic resistance. Beyond the algorithmic framework, strategies such as creating viral memes and manually commenting on popular posts about trending events introduce innovative forms of algorithmic resistance. However, overall, regardless of whether within or beyond the algorithmic framework, netizens’ algorithmic resistance behavior is characterized by internal conflicts and relatively loose collective action. This study offers new insights into expanding the concept of algorithmic resistance, enriching the collective algorithmic resistance behaviors of netizens, and the negotiation of conflicting folk theories within those groups. It provides important implications for future research on the complex power struggles between algorithms and netizens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data & Society
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251331949
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boosting popularity: Folk theories and algorithmic resistance of visibility contests in the comment sections

Guoning Zhao
Big Data & Society
Social Media and Politics
article

Boosting popularity: Folk theories and algorithmic resistance of visibility contests in the comment sections

Guoning Zhao
article en

Abstract

This study examines the collective actions of Chinese netizens in contesting algorithm visibility through popularity-boosting comments. Employing a netnographic approach within the theoretical frameworks of algorithm resistance and folk theories, the research analyzes popularity-boosting comments ( N = 900) and discussions regarding these practices ( N = 492) on Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and Weibo. The findings reveal that algorithmic resistance effectively sustains the lifecycle of posts and extends their dissemination. Netizens primarily engage in this resistance along two pathways: Within and beyond the algorithmic framework. Within the framework, conflicting folk theories trigger netizens’ internal power struggles, undermining the consistency and continuity of collective algorithmic resistance. Beyond the algorithmic framework, strategies such as creating viral memes and manually commenting on popular posts about trending events introduce innovative forms of algorithmic resistance. However, overall, regardless of whether within or beyond the algorithmic framework, netizens’ algorithmic resistance behavior is characterized by internal conflicts and relatively loose collective action. This study offers new insights into expanding the concept of algorithmic resistance, enriching the collective algorithmic resistance behaviors of netizens, and the negotiation of conflicting folk theories within those groups. It provides important implications for future research on the complex power struggles between algorithms and netizens.

Big Data & SocietyVol. 12(2)
Communication University of China (CN)
Communication University of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.