Classic Methodologies: Why They Still Matter

ABSTRACT While recognizing the importance of innovative, new approaches to evaluation, the guest editors and authors present this special issue of New Directions for Evaluation , urging evaluators to revisit established methodologies to address the growing complexity and ambiguity of today's wicked problems and indeed any problem they are commissioned to evaluate. Within this issue, we revisit four key methodologies of benchmarking, environmental scanning, rapid reconnaissance, and strategic environmental assessment (SEA). We also ask evaluators to reflect on the importance of understanding their evaluation contexts, philosophical, and methodological approaches when making evaluation decisions. We argue that by understanding philosophical and methodological choices, we can produce evaluation outcomes that contribute to high‐level decision‐making. Our research highlights that the four methodologies outlined in this special issue have received limited attention in the evaluation literature. Therefore, we consider it timely to share our insights and practical applications of these methodologies. It is hoped that through this special issue we successfully argue these tried and tested methodologies have potential application across both strategic and tactical spaces, creating an interface for evaluators to value‐add to their practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20632
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classic Methodologies: Why They Still Matter

Benjamin Harris, Julianne Kealey
2 citations
New Directions for Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
4.21
article

Classic Methodologies: Why They Still Matter

Benjamin Harris, Julianne Kealey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT While recognizing the importance of innovative, new approaches to evaluation, the guest editors and authors present this special issue of New Directions for Evaluation , urging evaluators to revisit established methodologies to address the growing complexity and ambiguity of today's wicked problems and indeed any problem they are commissioned to evaluate. Within this issue, we revisit four key methodologies of benchmarking, environmental scanning, rapid reconnaissance, and strategic environmental assessment (SEA). We also ask evaluators to reflect on the importance of understanding their evaluation contexts, philosophical, and methodological approaches when making evaluation decisions. We argue that by understanding philosophical and methodological choices, we can produce evaluation outcomes that contribute to high‐level decision‐making. Our research highlights that the four methodologies outlined in this special issue have received limited attention in the evaluation literature. Therefore, we consider it timely to share our insights and practical applications of these methodologies. It is hoped that through this special issue we successfully argue these tried and tested methodologies have potential application across both strategic and tactical spaces, creating an interface for evaluators to value‐add to their practice.

New Directions for EvaluationVol. 2025(185-186)
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
University of Southern Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Classic Methodologies: Why They Still Matter — Benjamin Harris, Julianne Kealey · New Directions for Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS