Noise disturbance and lack of privacy: Modeling acoustic dissatisfaction in open-plan offices

Open-plan offices are well-known to be adversely affected by acoustic issues. This study aims to model acoustic dissatisfaction using measurements of room acoustics and sound environment during occupancy, and occupant surveys (n = 349) in 28 offices representing a diverse range of workplace parameters. As latent factors, the contribution of lack of privacy (LackPriv) was 25% higher than noise disturbance in predicting acoustic dissatisfaction (AcDsat). Room acoustic metrics based on sound pressure level (SPL) decay of speech (Lp,A,s,4m and rC) were better in predicting these factors than distraction distance (rD) based on speech transmission index. This contradicts previous findings, which may partly be due to the cross-sectional study design. Specifically, the trends for SPL-based metrics in predicting AcDsat and LackPriv go against expectations based on ISO 3382-3. For sound during occupation, LA,90 and psychoacoustic loudness (N90) predicted AcDsat, and a SPL fluctuation metric (MA,eq) predicted LackPriv. However, these metrics were weaker predictors than ISO 3382-3 metrics. Medium-sized offices exhibited higher dissatisfaction than larger (≥50 occupants) offices. Dissatisfaction varied substantially across parameters including ceiling heights, number of workstations, and years of work, but not between offices with fixed seating compared to more flexible and activity-based working configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036594
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Noise disturbance and lack of privacy: Modeling acoustic dissatisfaction in open-plan offices

Densil Cabrera, Richard de Dear, Valtteri Hongisto, Manuj Yadav et al.
3 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Facilities and Workplace Management
7.32
article

Noise disturbance and lack of privacy: Modeling acoustic dissatisfaction in open-plan offices

Densil Cabrera, Richard de Dear, Valtteri Hongisto, Manuj Yadav, Jungsoo Kim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Open-plan offices are well-known to be adversely affected by acoustic issues. This study aims to model acoustic dissatisfaction using measurements of room acoustics and sound environment during occupancy, and occupant surveys (n = 349) in 28 offices representing a diverse range of workplace parameters. As latent factors, the contribution of lack of privacy (LackPriv) was 25% higher than noise disturbance in predicting acoustic dissatisfaction (AcDsat). Room acoustic metrics based on sound pressure level (SPL) decay of speech (Lp,A,s,4m and rC) were better in predicting these factors than distraction distance (rD) based on speech transmission index. This contradicts previous findings, which may partly be due to the cross-sectional study design. Specifically, the trends for SPL-based metrics in predicting AcDsat and LackPriv go against expectations based on ISO 3382-3. For sound during occupation, LA,90 and psychoacoustic loudness (N90) predicted AcDsat, and a SPL fluctuation metric (MA,eq) predicted LackPriv. However, these metrics were weaker predictors than ISO 3382-3 metrics. Medium-sized offices exhibited higher dissatisfaction than larger (≥50 occupants) offices. Dissatisfaction varied substantially across parameters including ceiling heights, number of workstations, and years of work, but not between offices with fixed seating compared to more flexible and activity-based working configurations.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(5)
The University of Sydney (AU), Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Facilities and Workplace Management
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.