Social network structure and the radius of risk sharing

Abstract Informal risk sharing, an important coping strategy, is mediated by social networks. Does risk sharing extend beyond immediate connections? If so, what is its radius? I examine the radius of risk sharing as a function of network structure. To do so, I employ community detection—a tool imported from network science—and dyadic regression. I find evidence the radius of risk sharing extends beyond direct connections. Using data from a behavioral experiment in Colombia, I find that detected community co-membership and distance-2 connections (i.e., friends of friends) explain co-membership in experimental risk sharing groups. Using data from a village census in Tanzania, I find that distance-2 and 3 connections explain risk sharing transfers, but detected community co-membership does not. I address a crucial issue of network sampling in the Colombia illustration using simulation methods, finding my preferred specification is robust to this concern. These methods may benefit those who seek to understand the quality of risk sharing when risk sharing groups are loosely defined and illegible to outsiders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01453-8
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social network structure and the radius of risk sharing

Daniel Putman
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Social network structure and the radius of risk sharing

Daniel Putman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Informal risk sharing, an important coping strategy, is mediated by social networks. Does risk sharing extend beyond immediate connections? If so, what is its radius? I examine the radius of risk sharing as a function of network structure. To do so, I employ community detection—a tool imported from network science—and dyadic regression. I find evidence the radius of risk sharing extends beyond direct connections. Using data from a behavioral experiment in Colombia, I find that detected community co-membership and distance-2 connections (i.e., friends of friends) explain co-membership in experimental risk sharing groups. Using data from a village census in Tanzania, I find that distance-2 and 3 connections explain risk sharing transfers, but detected community co-membership does not. I address a crucial issue of network sampling in the Colombia illustration using simulation methods, finding my preferred specification is robust to this concern. These methods may benefit those who seek to understand the quality of risk sharing when risk sharing groups are loosely defined and illegible to outsiders.

Social Network Analysis and MiningVol. 15(1)
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.