Does Excellence Correspond to Universal Inequality Level?

We study the inequality of citations received for different publications of various researchers and Nobel laureates in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine and Economics using Google Scholar data from 2012 to 2024. Citation distributions are found to be highly unequal, with even greater disparity among Nobel laureates. Measures of inequality, such as the Gini and Kolkata indices, emerge as useful indicators for distinguishing Nobel laureates from others. Such high inequality corresponds to growing critical fluctuations, suggesting that excellence aligns with an imminent (self-organized dynamical) critical point. Additionally, Nobel laureates exhibit systematically lower values of the Tsallis-Pareto parameter <i>b</i> and Shannon entropy, indicating more structured citation distributions. We also analyze the inequality in Olympic medal tallies across countries and find similar levels of disparity. Our results suggest that inequality measures can serve as proxies for competitiveness and excellence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27050495
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Excellence Correspond to Universal Inequality Level?

Soumyajyoti Biswas, Sourav Ghosh, Zoltán Néda, Asim Kumar Ghosh et al.
2 citations
Entropy
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
8.40
article

Does Excellence Correspond to Universal Inequality Level?

Soumyajyoti Biswas, Sourav Ghosh, Zoltán Néda, Asim Kumar Ghosh, Máté Józsa, Bikas K. Chakrabarti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We study the inequality of citations received for different publications of various researchers and Nobel laureates in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine and Economics using Google Scholar data from 2012 to 2024. Citation distributions are found to be highly unequal, with even greater disparity among Nobel laureates. Measures of inequality, such as the Gini and Kolkata indices, emerge as useful indicators for distinguishing Nobel laureates from others. Such high inequality corresponds to growing critical fluctuations, suggesting that excellence aligns with an imminent (self-organized dynamical) critical point. Additionally, Nobel laureates exhibit systematically lower values of the Tsallis-Pareto parameter <i>b</i> and Shannon entropy, indicating more structured citation distributions. We also analyze the inequality in Olympic medal tallies across countries and find similar levels of disparity. Our results suggest that inequality measures can serve as proxies for competitiveness and excellence.

EntropyVol. 27(5)
Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics (IN), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), SRM University (IN), Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.