How do soft skills enhance the audit committee’s effectiveness in South African municipalities?
This study examines how soft skills enhance the audit committee effectiveness in South African municipalities. The paper adopts the positivist paradigm and a quantitative technique. Surveys were conducted using questionnaires, and data was collected from 87 participants using purposive sampling. Data were analysed using the exploratory factor analysis with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) value of 0.716 level and descriptive statistics which indicates that the audit committee's soft skills demonstrate commitment to understanding the operations. The paper’s finding is connected to audit committees in charge of the public sector. The paper highlights the need for improved audit committee soft skills for good judgement, objectivity and honesty, a high level of ethics, strong communication skills, and freedom from undue influence or intimidation. Further research is needed to examine the role of soft skills on auditors and management in South African municipalities. The Study recommends enhancing audit committee effectiveness in South African municipalities through structured soft skills training and mandatory governance reforms. This includes training programs on leadership and stakeholder engagement, soft skills assessments in audit committee selection, and professional certifications for audit committees. This study addresses a significant gap in the literature by specifically focusing on audit committee soft skills.
Authors
- Thapelo Lebese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-8484)
- Kgobalale Nebbel Motubatse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1997-5441)
Institutions
- Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Business Ecosystem and Strategy (2687-2293)
- Published
- 2025-05-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i2.746
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.76