Phonemic simplification in apraxia of speech and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia

There are varied reports about the extent to which people with apraxia of speech (AOS) simplify the phonemic complexity of utterances they attempt to produce and whether the degree to which they do so might inform differential diagnosis relative to aphasia with phonemic paraphasia (APP). Our study purpose was to determine whether either or both diagnostic groups simplify the phonemic content for words they repeat during a typical motor speech evaluation. 195 people with aphasia after stroke were assigned to four diagnostic groups based on quantitative metrics of core speech criteria for AOS and APP. In addition to the target groups, the sample was divided into a borderline group with equivocal feature combinations (BL) and a group with minimal sound production errors (MIN). Monosyllabic, disyllabic, and multisyllabic words were transcribed phonetically and scored for phonemic complexity. The ratio of produced complexity relative to target complexity - the word complexity measure (WCM) ratio - was compared across groups. According to the WCM ratio, participants in all four groups, including the group with minimal speech sound involvement, simplified more productions than they complicated. Those who produced the most speech sound errors also displayed greater phonemic simplification. People with stroke-induced aphasia sometimes produce words that are phonemic complications of targets, but more often they simplify the phonemic output. We conclude that phonemic simplification at the word level has limited value for differentiating clinically between AOS and APP. Future research should consider comparing alternative simplification measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2498437
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phonemic simplification in apraxia of speech and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia

Tyson G. Harmon, Katarina L. Haley, Adam Jacks, Peter E. Turkeltaub et al.
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Phonemic simplification in apraxia of speech and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia

Tyson G. Harmon, Katarina L. Haley, Adam Jacks, Peter E. Turkeltaub, Jessica D. Richardson
article en

Abstract

There are varied reports about the extent to which people with apraxia of speech (AOS) simplify the phonemic complexity of utterances they attempt to produce and whether the degree to which they do so might inform differential diagnosis relative to aphasia with phonemic paraphasia (APP). Our study purpose was to determine whether either or both diagnostic groups simplify the phonemic content for words they repeat during a typical motor speech evaluation. 195 people with aphasia after stroke were assigned to four diagnostic groups based on quantitative metrics of core speech criteria for AOS and APP. In addition to the target groups, the sample was divided into a borderline group with equivocal feature combinations (BL) and a group with minimal sound production errors (MIN). Monosyllabic, disyllabic, and multisyllabic words were transcribed phonetically and scored for phonemic complexity. The ratio of produced complexity relative to target complexity - the word complexity measure (WCM) ratio - was compared across groups. According to the WCM ratio, participants in all four groups, including the group with minimal speech sound involvement, simplified more productions than they complicated. Those who produced the most speech sound errors also displayed greater phonemic simplification. People with stroke-induced aphasia sometimes produce words that are phonemic complications of targets, but more often they simplify the phonemic output. We conclude that phonemic simplification at the word level has limited value for differentiating clinically between AOS and APP. Future research should consider comparing alternative simplification measures.

Clinical Linguistics & PhoneticsVol. 40(2)
Brigham Young University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Georgetown University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.