Antecedents of Nonprofit Collaboration: A Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Nonprofit organizations often rely on collaboration to address complex challenges and achieve shared goals. Despite extensive research on this topic, the antecedents of such collaborations remain inconsistently understood. As part of the effort to extract and integrate knowledge from decades of research on nonprofit collaboration within and across sectoral boundaries, this article examines the individual, organizational, and environmental‐level antecedents of nonprofit collaboration by producing a meta‐analysis of 47 research articles employing 582 effect sizes. The findings show that, out of 22 antecedents identified in our study, one individual‐level antecedent (trust) and six organizational‐level antecedents (size, capacity, homophily, shared vision, revenue dependency, and resource insufficiency) are significantly associated with a nonprofit respondent's decision or preference to engage (or not to engage) in collaborative activities with other organizations. Overall, the decision to collaborate is a story best told at the organizational level, based mainly on two broad sets of organizational considerations: resource needs and shared qualities among partners. These insights offer a clearer roadmap for understanding the conditions that foster collaboration, informing both future research and practical strategies for effective partnerships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21664
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antecedents of Nonprofit Collaboration: A Meta‐Analysis

Beth Gazley, ChiaKo Hung, Chao Guo
4 citations
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
16.81
article

Antecedents of Nonprofit Collaboration: A Meta‐Analysis

Beth Gazley, ChiaKo Hung, Chao Guo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nonprofit organizations often rely on collaboration to address complex challenges and achieve shared goals. Despite extensive research on this topic, the antecedents of such collaborations remain inconsistently understood. As part of the effort to extract and integrate knowledge from decades of research on nonprofit collaboration within and across sectoral boundaries, this article examines the individual, organizational, and environmental‐level antecedents of nonprofit collaboration by producing a meta‐analysis of 47 research articles employing 582 effect sizes. The findings show that, out of 22 antecedents identified in our study, one individual‐level antecedent (trust) and six organizational‐level antecedents (size, capacity, homophily, shared vision, revenue dependency, and resource insufficiency) are significantly associated with a nonprofit respondent's decision or preference to engage (or not to engage) in collaborative activities with other organizations. Overall, the decision to collaborate is a story best told at the organizational level, based mainly on two broad sets of organizational considerations: resource needs and shared qualities among partners. These insights offer a clearer roadmap for understanding the conditions that foster collaboration, informing both future research and practical strategies for effective partnerships.

Nonprofit Management and LeadershipVol. 36(2)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.