A Paradigm Shift: From Batch Processing to Flow Chemistry

Customisable flow chemistry reactors are becoming more affordable and accessible to wider research community. Coupled with rapidly advancing machine learning (ML) optimisation algorithms, time consuming research activities like catalyst discovery, reaction screening and optimisation can now be achievable quicker in flow, placing us in an interesting crossroad: should we start thinking about flow integration earlier in the research phase? In this perspective, parallels and differences between batch and flow heterogeneous catalytic reaction optimisations will be discussed with practical examples. Challenges in flow and batch processing are compared, combined with fresh perspectives of how reaction conditions can be adjusted more flexibly in multi-pass flow setting. Finally, recent progress of integrating computational techniques into flow process optimisation of contemporary "chemical looping" and paired reactions for more sustainable chemical productions will also be discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202411519
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Paradigm Shift: From Batch Processing to Flow Chemistry

Keval Mehta, Albertus D. Handoko, Ivan P. Parkin, Riko I Made et al.
2 citations
Small
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
1.35
article

A Paradigm Shift: From Batch Processing to Flow Chemistry

Keval Mehta, Albertus D. Handoko, Ivan P. Parkin, Riko I Made, Gopinathan Sankar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Customisable flow chemistry reactors are becoming more affordable and accessible to wider research community. Coupled with rapidly advancing machine learning (ML) optimisation algorithms, time consuming research activities like catalyst discovery, reaction screening and optimisation can now be achievable quicker in flow, placing us in an interesting crossroad: should we start thinking about flow integration earlier in the research phase? In this perspective, parallels and differences between batch and flow heterogeneous catalytic reaction optimisations will be discussed with practical examples. Challenges in flow and batch processing are compared, combined with fresh perspectives of how reaction conditions can be adjusted more flexibly in multi-pass flow setting. Finally, recent progress of integrating computational techniques into flow process optimisation of contemporary "chemical looping" and paired reactions for more sustainable chemical productions will also be discussed.

SmallVol. 21(24)
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (SG), University College London (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.