Contrasting Solution and Gas‐Phase: Understanding Structure and Reactivity of Gold‐Diazenyl Intermediates

Abstract Gold(I)‐catalyzed cross‐coupling reactions with aryldiazonium salts are instrumental in forming C─C and C─N bonds. However, mechanistic details remain unclear, particularly the role of diazenyl intermediates. We employ stoichiometric reactions, NMR spectroscopy, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and infrared photodissociation spectroscopy to investigate the reactivity of gold‐aryl complexes with aryldiazenyl radicals and aryldiazonium ions. Our results reveal that [(NHC)Au(Ar)] complexes form short‐lived electron donor‐acceptor (EDA) complexes [(NHC)Au(Ar)(Ar'N 2 )] + in solution, which undergo a C─N coupling reaction during the transfer to the gas phase to form gold(I) azoarene complexes. The rearrangements of the gold complexes during the transfer from the solution to the gas phase were studied by ion‐mobility separation, IRPD spectra, and delayed reactant labeling experiments. We also show that gold‐chloride complexes facilitate the oxidative addition of aryldiazonium ions to form [(NHC)Au III (Cl)(Ar)(N 2 )] + , suggesting an alternative non‐radical mechanism initiating the C─C bond formation reactions. In solution‐phase reactivity, ligand steric effects are crucial in steering the reaction selectivity: IMes ligands favor N 2 expulsion followed by the C─C coupling, while bulkier IPr and IPent ligands promote the C─N coupling. These findings refine our understanding of gold(I)‐mediated cross‐coupling reactions, and the observed solution‐gas phase discrepancies highlight the need for careful interpretation of ESI‐MS data in mechanistic studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Helvetica Chimica Acta
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.202500057
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting Solution and Gas‐Phase: Understanding Structure and Reactivity of Gold‐Diazenyl Intermediates

Jaya Mehara, Jana Roithová, Paul B. White, Aleksandr Y. Pereverzev et al.
1 citations
Helvetica Chimica Acta
Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
0.73
article

Contrasting Solution and Gas‐Phase: Understanding Structure and Reactivity of Gold‐Diazenyl Intermediates

Jaya Mehara, Jana Roithová, Paul B. White, Aleksandr Y. Pereverzev, Florian Ruepp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Gold(I)‐catalyzed cross‐coupling reactions with aryldiazonium salts are instrumental in forming C─C and C─N bonds. However, mechanistic details remain unclear, particularly the role of diazenyl intermediates. We employ stoichiometric reactions, NMR spectroscopy, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and infrared photodissociation spectroscopy to investigate the reactivity of gold‐aryl complexes with aryldiazenyl radicals and aryldiazonium ions. Our results reveal that [(NHC)Au(Ar)] complexes form short‐lived electron donor‐acceptor (EDA) complexes [(NHC)Au(Ar)(Ar'N 2 )] + in solution, which undergo a C─N coupling reaction during the transfer to the gas phase to form gold(I) azoarene complexes. The rearrangements of the gold complexes during the transfer from the solution to the gas phase were studied by ion‐mobility separation, IRPD spectra, and delayed reactant labeling experiments. We also show that gold‐chloride complexes facilitate the oxidative addition of aryldiazonium ions to form [(NHC)Au III (Cl)(Ar)(N 2 )] + , suggesting an alternative non‐radical mechanism initiating the C─C bond formation reactions. In solution‐phase reactivity, ligand steric effects are crucial in steering the reaction selectivity: IMes ligands favor N 2 expulsion followed by the C─C coupling, while bulkier IPr and IPent ligands promote the C─N coupling. These findings refine our understanding of gold(I)‐mediated cross‐coupling reactions, and the observed solution‐gas phase discrepancies highlight the need for careful interpretation of ESI‐MS data in mechanistic studies.

Helvetica Chimica Acta
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), ETH Zurich (CH), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.