What Makes a “Good” Patient?

The “ideal patient,” from the perspective of healthcare workers, emphasizes qualities such as independence, rationality, and compliance. These characteristics mirror what physicians and nurses value in themselves, leading to more effective and rewarding interactions. However, not all patients fit this mold, resulting in them being labeled “difficult” or “challenging.” The article delves into the ethical principles that underpin the clinician–patient relationship, including autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, stressing that these principles must be upheld regardless of patient behavior. It further examines four models of physician–patient relationships — paternalistic, informative, interpretive, and deliberative, highlighting the complexities and ethical dilemmas inherent in medical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Administration Leadership & Management Journal
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55834/halmj.5894322434
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Makes a “Good” Patient?

Joan Naidorf
Healthcare Administration Leadership & Management Journal
Ethics in medical practice
article

What Makes a “Good” Patient?

Joan Naidorf
article en

Abstract

The “ideal patient,” from the perspective of healthcare workers, emphasizes qualities such as independence, rationality, and compliance. These characteristics mirror what physicians and nurses value in themselves, leading to more effective and rewarding interactions. However, not all patients fit this mold, resulting in them being labeled “difficult” or “challenging.” The article delves into the ethical principles that underpin the clinician–patient relationship, including autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, stressing that these principles must be upheld regardless of patient behavior. It further examines four models of physician–patient relationships — paternalistic, informative, interpretive, and deliberative, highlighting the complexities and ethical dilemmas inherent in medical practice.

Healthcare Administration Leadership & Management JournalVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.