Archaeobotany in Estonia – history, state of the art and future perspectives

Archaeobotany is currently an underutilised discipline in Estonian archaeological research. This paper sheds light on the current state of archaeobotanical research in Estonia by analysing the spatial and temporal distribution of archaeobotanical sampling across three time periods: until 1980, 1981–1999, and 2000–2024. We outline the usages of archaeobotany and the bene­fits that the analysis of plant remains can offer in acquiring a deeper understanding of archae­ological questions. While archaeobotanical sampling is a common practice in many countries, the discipline is struggling in Estonia due to a lack of researchers, laboratories, samples, and, ultimately, awareness of its value in understanding the past. In this article, we show how sediment sampling patterns have led to a spatially and temporally unequal archaeobotanical knowledge within Estonia. We emphasise the need for compulsory sampling during archae­ological excavations, combined sampling for macro­ and potentially microbotanical remains, as well as sampling from different contexts besides sediment, such as dental calculus, pottery food crust, and surfaces and pores of tools.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Estonian Journal of Archaeology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3176/arch.2025.1.02
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archaeobotany in Estonia – history, state of the art and future perspectives

Kristiina Johanson, Sirje Hiie, Agnes Unt
Estonian Journal of Archaeology
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

Archaeobotany in Estonia – history, state of the art and future perspectives

Kristiina Johanson, Sirje Hiie, Agnes Unt
article en

Abstract

Archaeobotany is currently an underutilised discipline in Estonian archaeological research. This paper sheds light on the current state of archaeobotanical research in Estonia by analysing the spatial and temporal distribution of archaeobotanical sampling across three time periods: until 1980, 1981–1999, and 2000–2024. We outline the usages of archaeobotany and the bene­fits that the analysis of plant remains can offer in acquiring a deeper understanding of archae­ological questions. While archaeobotanical sampling is a common practice in many countries, the discipline is struggling in Estonia due to a lack of researchers, laboratories, samples, and, ultimately, awareness of its value in understanding the past. In this article, we show how sediment sampling patterns have led to a spatially and temporally unequal archaeobotanical knowledge within Estonia. We emphasise the need for compulsory sampling during archae­ological excavations, combined sampling for macro­ and potentially microbotanical remains, as well as sampling from different contexts besides sediment, such as dental calculus, pottery food crust, and surfaces and pores of tools.

Estonian Journal of ArchaeologyVol. 29(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Archaeobotany in Estonia – history, state of the art and future perspectives — Kristiina Johanson, Sirje Hiie, et al. · Estonian Journal of Archaeology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS