Validation of PIM 3, Prism III, and Pelod 2 Scores As Predictors of Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition in pediatric patients characterized by alveolar fluid accumulation that disrupts gas exchange. Various scoring systems—Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3), Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD 2)—are utilized to estimate mortality, disease severity, and organ dysfunction. However, their validation specifically in pediatric ARDS remains limited. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the predictive validity of PIM 3, PRISM III, and PELOD 2 in children aged 1 month to 18 years diagnosed with ARDS and admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). A total of 60 patients were enrolled, with 16 observed for a full 28-day period and 44 reaching clinical outcomes earlier (19 deaths, 25 survivals). Each scoring system was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine optimal cut-off values for mortality prediction. The PIM 3 score with a cut-off of ≥6.8 yielded a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 95.0%. PRISM III with a cut-off of ≥26 showed 85.0% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while PELOD 2 with a cut-off of ≥9 demonstrated similar performance (85.0% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Among the three, PIM 3 exhibited superior sensitivity for mortality prediction. These findings support the clinical utility of PIM 3 as a more responsive tool for early risk stratification in pediatric ARDS, aiding in timely and targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i4.49949
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of PIM 3, Prism III, and Pelod 2 Scores As Predictors of Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

I Gusti Ngurah Sanjaya Putra, Ida Bagus Gede Suparyatha, Rina Margareth Sihombing
Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Validation of PIM 3, Prism III, and Pelod 2 Scores As Predictors of Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

I Gusti Ngurah Sanjaya Putra, Ida Bagus Gede Suparyatha, Rina Margareth Sihombing
article en

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition in pediatric patients characterized by alveolar fluid accumulation that disrupts gas exchange. Various scoring systems—Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3), Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III), and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD 2)—are utilized to estimate mortality, disease severity, and organ dysfunction. However, their validation specifically in pediatric ARDS remains limited. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the predictive validity of PIM 3, PRISM III, and PELOD 2 in children aged 1 month to 18 years diagnosed with ARDS and admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). A total of 60 patients were enrolled, with 16 observed for a full 28-day period and 44 reaching clinical outcomes earlier (19 deaths, 25 survivals). Each scoring system was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine optimal cut-off values for mortality prediction. The PIM 3 score with a cut-off of ≥6.8 yielded a sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 95.0%. PRISM III with a cut-off of ≥26 showed 85.0% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while PELOD 2 with a cut-off of ≥9 demonstrated similar performance (85.0% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Among the three, PIM 3 exhibited superior sensitivity for mortality prediction. These findings support the clinical utility of PIM 3 as a more responsive tool for early risk stratification in pediatric ARDS, aiding in timely and targeted interventions.

Eduvest - Journal Of Universal StudiesVol. 5(4)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.