Parental rights and state concerns: the policy problematisation of home education

This paper examines the contestations surrounding the rights and responsibilities of the state and parents to educate children. Focusing our analysis on home education, we suggest that these disputes represent the convergence of–at times agonistic–parental and state politics of care and concern surrounding education and children. To advance our argument, we analyse how the problem of ‘home education’ is represented in two policy reports across two different states in Australia–New South Wales and Queensland. Conceptually approaching these reports as performative acts of state ‘care and concern’, our analysis demonstrates how the policy problem of home education is constructed around three tensions: 1) parental vs state claims to educating children; 2) the knowable and unknowable home educator; and 3) distinct claims to expertise and knowledge. We argue that ultimately these reports understand the problem of home education to be one of state authority and reach, with home education represented to be falling too far from the realm of state oversight whilst at the same time a legitimate claim of parental authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Policy
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2025.2498884
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental rights and state concerns: the policy problematisation of home education

Benjamin Zonca, Jessica Gerrard, Bonita Cabiles, Christopher T. McCaw et al.
1 citations
Journal of Education Policy
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
8.93
article

Parental rights and state concerns: the policy problematisation of home education

Benjamin Zonca, Jessica Gerrard, Bonita Cabiles, Christopher T. McCaw, Maree Martinussen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the contestations surrounding the rights and responsibilities of the state and parents to educate children. Focusing our analysis on home education, we suggest that these disputes represent the convergence of–at times agonistic–parental and state politics of care and concern surrounding education and children. To advance our argument, we analyse how the problem of ‘home education’ is represented in two policy reports across two different states in Australia–New South Wales and Queensland. Conceptually approaching these reports as performative acts of state ‘care and concern’, our analysis demonstrates how the policy problem of home education is constructed around three tensions: 1) parental vs state claims to educating children; 2) the knowable and unknowable home educator; and 3) distinct claims to expertise and knowledge. We argue that ultimately these reports understand the problem of home education to be one of state authority and reach, with home education represented to be falling too far from the realm of state oversight whilst at the same time a legitimate claim of parental authority.

Journal of Education PolicyVol. 40(5)
Charles Sturt University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.